Literature DB >> 10508027

Use of pharmacodynamic indices to predict efficacy of combination therapy in vivo.

J W Mouton1, M L van Ogtrop, D Andes, W A Craig.   

Abstract

Although combination therapy with antimicrobial agents is often used, no available method explains or predicts the efficacies of these combinations satisfactorily. Since the efficacies of antimicrobial agents can be described by pharmacodynamic indices (PDIs), such as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), peak level, and the time that the concentration is above the MIC (time>MIC), it was hypothesized that the same PDIs would be valid in explaining efficacy during combination therapy. Twenty-four-hour efficacy data (numbers of CFU) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neutropenic mouse thigh model were determined for various combination regimens: ticarcillin-tobramycin (n = 41 different regimens), ceftazidime-netilmicin (n = 60), ciprofloxacin-ceftazidime (n = 59), netilmicin-ciprofloxacin (n = 38) and for each of these agents given singly. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the importance of various PDIs (time>MIC, time>0.25 x the MIC, time>4 x the MIC, peak level, AUC, AUC/MIC, and their logarithmically transformed values) during monotherapy and combination therapy. The PDIs that best explained the efficacies of single-agent regimens were time>0.25 x the MIC for beta-lactams and log AUC/MIC for ciprofloxacin and the aminoglycosides. For the combination regimens, regression analysis showed that efficacy could best be explained by the combination of the two PDIs that each best explained the response for the respective agents given singly. A regression model for the efficacy of combination therapy was developed by use of a linear combination of the regression models of the PDI with the highest R(2) for each agent given singly. The model values for the single-agent therapies were then used in that equation, and the predicted values that were obtained were compared with the experimental values. The responses of the combination regimens could best be predicted by the sum of the responses of the single-agent regimens as functions of their respective PDIs (e.g., time>0.25 x the MIC for ticarcillin and log AUC/MIC for tobramycin). The relationship between the predicted response and the observed response for the combination regimens may be useful for determination of the presence of synergism. We conclude that the PDIs for the individual drugs used in this study are class dependent and predictive of outcome not only when the drugs are given as single agents but also when they are given in combination. When given in combination, there appears to be a degree of synergism independent of the dosing regimen applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10508027      PMCID: PMC89503          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.10.2473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin in combination with ceftazidime, aztreonam, and azlocillin against multiresistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  C I Bustamante; R C Wharton; J C Wade
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Pharmacodynamic interactions of antibiotics alone and in combination.

Authors:  J J Schentag; L C Strenkoski-Nix; D E Nix; A Forrest
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Comparison of techniques for measurement of in vitro antibiotic synergism.

Authors:  C W Norden; H Wentzel; E Keleti
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Antimicrobial synergism--an elusive concept.

Authors:  R C Moellering
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective.

Authors:  W R Greco; G Bravo; J C Parsons
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Impact of the dosage schedule on the efficacy of ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats.

Authors:  R Roosendaal; I A Bakker-Woudenberg; M van den Berghe-van Raffe; J C Vink-van den Berg; B M Michel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus determined by the killing curve method: antibiotic comparisons and synergistic interactions.

Authors:  L J Chalkley; H J Koornhof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of the bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with selected antipseudomonal beta-lactam agents against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  C W Stratton; J J Franke; L S Weeks; F A Manion
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; D E Nix; C W Stratton; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections.

Authors:  W A Craig; J Redington; S C Ebert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; T J Walsh; V Chaturvedi; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Ghannoum; L L Gosey; F C Odds; M G Rinaldi; D J Sheehan; D W Warnock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Use of Monte Carlo simulations to select therapeutic doses and provisional breakpoints of BAL9141.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann; Stuart Shapiro; Norman Nashed; Nieko C Punt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Combined with Tazobactam against Clinically Relevant Enterobacteriaceae in a Neutropenic Mouse Thigh Model.

Authors:  Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Claudia Lagarde; Jan den Hartigh; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Population pharmacokinetic model for gatifloxacin in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Rubino; Edmund V Capparelli; John S Bradley; Jeffrey L Blumer; Gregory L Kearns; Michael Reed; Richard F Jacobs; Brenda Cirincione; Dennis M Grasela
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A concept for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dosage adjustment in renal impairment: the case of aminoglycosides.

Authors:  D Czock; M Giehl; F Keller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  New susceptibility breakpoints for first-line antituberculosis drugs based on antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic science and population pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Tawanda Gumbo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Posaconazole and amphotericin B combination therapy against Cryptococcus neoformans infection.

Authors:  Francesco Barchiesi; Elisabetta Spreghini; Anna M Schimizzi; Monia Maracci; Daniele Giannini; Flavia Carle; Giorgio Scalise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Exploring the role of the immune response in preventing antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Andreas Handel; Elisa Margolis; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Rapid direct method for monitoring antibiotics in a mouse model of bacterial biofilm infection.

Authors:  Jagath L Kadurugamuwa; Lin V Sin; Jun Yu; Kevin P Francis; Richard Kimura; Tony Purchio; Pamela R Contag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antimicrobial breakpoint estimation accounting for variability in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Goue Denis Gohore Bi; Jun Li; Fahima Nekka
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.