Literature DB >> 3896014

Self-administered nalbuphine, morphine and pethidine. Comparison, by intravenous route, following cholecystectomy.

M Bahar, M Rosen, M D Vickers.   

Abstract

In a double-blind clinical trial of 48 patients, nalbuphine, morphine, and pethidine were compared by on-demand intravenous analgesia during the first 24 hours after cholecystectomy. Overall pain relief (visual analogue score) was recorded by the patients as 50 (SEM 4) for nalbuphine, 44 (SEM 4) for morphine and 53 (SEM 5) for pethidine. These scores were not significantly different. The mean demand for each drug over the 24-hour period was 70 (SEM 12) mg for nalbuphine, 46 (SEM 6) mg for morphine and 614 (SEM 49) mg for pethidine. Pain on movement, either during deep breathing or turning, was found to be less well controlled after nalbuphine (70, SEM 2), and pethidine (67 SEM 7) than after morphine (52, SEM 5; p less than 0.01). The incidence of side effects was similar with each drug. Nalbuphine is a useful postoperative analgesic, as effective as pethidine. Nalbuphine 15 mg is apparently equipotent with morphine 10 mg or pethidine 120 mg by this mode of administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3896014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous nalbuphine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A R Aitkenhead; E S Lin; K J Achola
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy wise?

Authors:  C J Saunders; B F Leary; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Predictors and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for procedural pain associated with turning among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Bonnie Faigeles; Jill Howie-Esquivel; Christine Miaskowski; Julie Stanik-Hutt; Carol Thompson; Cheri White; Lorie Rietman Wild; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.

Authors:  T H Gould; D L Crosby; M Harmer; S M Lloyd; J N Lunn; G A Rees; D E Roberts; J A Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

5.  Self-administered intranasal meperidine for postoperative pain management.

Authors:  H W Striebel; B Bonillo; R Schwagmeier; D Dopjans; C Spies
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Sex differences in opioid analgesia and addiction: interactions among opioid receptors and estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Cynthia Wei-Sheng Lee; Ing-Kang Ho
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.395

7.  Prediction formulas for individual opioid analgesic requirements based on genetic polymorphism analyses.

Authors:  Kaori Yoshida; Daisuke Nishizawa; Takashi Ichinomiya; Tatsuya Ichinohe; Masakazu Hayashida; Ken-ichi Fukuda; Kazutaka Ikeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pain management of nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients admitted intensive care unit of different ages.

Authors:  Kaiqiang Ji; Xiaoying Gong; Ting Luan; Xiaopeng Gao; Bin Zang
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-26

9.  Association between KCNJ6 (GIRK2) gene polymorphisms and postoperative analgesic requirements after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishizawa; Makoto Nagashima; Ryoji Katoh; Yasuo Satoh; Megumi Tagami; Shinya Kasai; Yasukazu Ogai; Wenhua Han; Junko Hasegawa; Naohito Shimoyama; Ichiro Sora; Masakazu Hayashida; Kazutaka Ikeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.