Literature DB >> 3893922

Update on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of theophylline.

L Hendeles, M Massanari, M Weinberger.   

Abstract

Theophylline has emerged as a major prophylactic agent for controlling the symptoms of chronic asthma, but it provides little if any relief of pulmonary symptoms caused by irreversible chronic airways obstruction. Although in vitro it inhibits phosphodiesterase and antagonizes adenosine receptors, theophylline's mechanism of action in asthma is unknown. Often, 10 to 20 micrograms/ml is used as the range of serum concentrations where there is the greatest likelihood of obtaining maximal benefit safely. Slow-release products have the potential to provide more stable serum concentrations with longer dosing intervals. However, clinically important differences in rate and sometimes extent of absorption exist between the 15 formulations sold under 29 brand names in this country. In patients with more rapid elimination, few products have sufficiently slow absorption to allow twice-daily use. Often these formulations must be administered every eight hours to prevent breakthrough in asthmatic symptoms despite promotional claims to the contrary. In patients with slower elimination, differences among products are unlikely to be clinically important with 12-hour dosing intervals. Current products approved for "once-a-day" dosing are clinically inadequate because of erratic absorption or excessive serum concentration fluctuations. Moreover, food induces dose dumping of potentially toxic amounts of theophylline from Theo-24, greatly increases the extent of absorption of theophylline from Uniphyl, decreases extent of absorption from Theo-dur-Sprinkle capsules, but has no clinically important effect on Theo-Dur tablets, Theobid, Slo-Bid, or Somophyllin-CRT. The effects of food or other factors that alter gastrointestinal physiology on theophylline absorption are unknown for most other products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3893922     DOI: 10.1378/chest.88.2_supplement.103s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  11 in total

Review 1.  Long-term drug treatment of asthma in children.

Authors:  K F Kerrebijn
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Adverse reactions and interactions with theophylline.

Authors:  M H Skinner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Management of chronic airway obstruction: theophylline--is it still necessary?

Authors:  D Ukena; G W Sybrecht
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Drug therapy approaches in the treatment of acute severe asthma in hospitalised children.

Authors:  L K DeNicola; M O Gayle; K V Blake
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  The effect of respiratory disorders on clinical pharmacokinetic variables.

Authors:  A M Taburet; C Tollier; C Richard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict disposition of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 metabolized drugs in pregnant women.

Authors:  Alice Ban Ke; Srikanth C Nallani; Ping Zhao; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Nina Isoherranen; Jashvant D Unadkat
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 7.  Role of extracorporeal drug removal in acute theophylline poisoning. A review.

Authors:  A Heath; K Knudsen
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of asthma treatment.

Authors:  A M Taburet; B Schmit
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Computer assisted design of a theophylline dosing regimen in acute bronchospasm: serum concentrations and clinical outcome.

Authors:  D Verner; H Seligmann; S Platt; S Dany; S Almog; L Zulty; H Halkin; D Ezra
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Age related differences in plasma theophylline levels.

Authors:  O Elidemir; S Kośay; O Hepözden; T Aysan; M Tufan
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.