Literature DB >> 3890538

Randomized trial of imipenem/cilastatin versus gentamicin and clindamycin in mixed flora infections.

J S Solomkin, W K Fant, J O Rivera, J W Alexander.   

Abstract

Results of a randomized trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin for mixed flora surgical sepsis are reported herein. Seventy-four patients were evaluable, 50 of whom had intra-abdominal sepsis. No imipenem-resistant initially infecting isolates were encountered. When outcome was evaluated on the basis of severity scoring (APACHE II), no difference in mortality was noted. However, therapy in two patients with Pseudomonas emerging from a polymicrobial flora failed with gentamicin, whereas no Pseudomonas failures were noted with imipenem/cilastatin. The major difference noted was in toxicity. There was a 20 percent incidence of nephrotoxicity in gentamicin-treated patients despite serum level monitoring and multiple dose adjustments. The degree of efficacy and the relative tolerability of imipenem/cilastatin in seriously ill surgical patients is demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3890538     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90106-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  15 in total

1.  Results of a multicenter trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin to tobramycin/clindamycin for intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; E P Dellinger; N V Christou; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Antibiotic combinations: should they be tested?

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; C T Eliopoulos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Imipenem/cilastatin: a pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  P Benfield; P Chrisp
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Role of aminoglycoside antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  J L Ho; M Barza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prospective randomized controlled study of ciprofloxacin versus imipenem-cilastatin in severe clinical infections.

Authors:  H Lode; R Wiley; G Höffken; J Wagner; K Borner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A prospective randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal and pelvic infections.

Authors:  L A Mandell; P L Turgeon; A R Ronalds
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09

8.  Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections requiring surgery.

Authors:  K Kanellakopoulou; H Giamarellou; P Papadothomakos; H Tsipras; J Chloroyiannis; R Theakou; P Sfikakis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; A S Malmborg; G Tunevall; B Wretlind; L Bergman; L O Mentzing; P O Nyström; E Kihlström; B Bäckstrand; T Skau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Imipenem/cilastatin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  S P Clissold; P A Todd; D M Campoli-Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.