Literature DB >> 3890240

Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence.

G V Poole.   

Abstract

The incidence of fascial disruption after major abdominal operations is 1% to 3%, and dehiscence is associated with a mortality rate of 15% to 20%. Although several systemic factors (e.g., malnutrition, increased age, male sex, and chronic treatment with steroids) have been associated with an increased risk of wound disruption, their clinical importance has been overstated. Local, mechanical factors such as wound infections, abdominal distention, and pulmonary complications appear to be more important and should be prevented or treated aggressively should they occur. Paramedian wounds are less secure than are midline wounds, but the latter, when closed properly, are probably equivalent to transverse wounds. The peritoneum need not be closed, but the fascia should be sutured securely. Monofilament suture materials are preferred, and the continuous suturing technique has theoretic and practical advantages. Retention sutures are unnecessary if the fascia is closed properly, and the wound itself should not be violated by a drain or stoma. Although fascial dehiscence may not be eliminated, its incidence can certainly be reduced with proper attention to the mechanics of fascial closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3890240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  38 in total

1.  Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.

Authors:  K Iwase; J Higaki; Y Tanaka; H Kondoh; M Yoshikawa; W Kamiike
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Vacuum-assisted close versus conventional treatment for postlaparotomy wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Yoon Song Ko; Sung Won Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  The degree of muscle relaxation requested by the surgens during upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Y Amaki; H Haziri; N Sugimoto; Y Shudo; K Kobayashi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  A novel approach to repair of wound dehiscence in the complicated patient.

Authors:  B P Kelley; L Heller
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  A prospective evaluation of the risk factors for development of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Lütfi Doğan; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Özaslan; Can Atalay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  [Tradition and progress in correction of large hernias].

Authors:  G Feifel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1995

Review 7.  Review of general surgery 1985.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Simple and safe technique for closure of midline abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  M H Abo-Ryia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  PDGF and FGF stimulate wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse.

Authors:  D G Greenhalgh; K H Sprugel; M J Murray; R Ross
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  [Fascial healing and wound failure].

Authors:  V Fackeldey; J Höer; U Klinge
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.