Literature DB >> 28194520

Simple and safe technique for closure of midline abdominal wound dehiscence.

M H Abo-Ryia1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess an alternative technique for closure of burst abdomen.
METHOD: After reduction of the viscera and toilet of abdominal cavity with debridement of any necrotic tissues in the skin or fascia, the skin was undermined to expose the aponeurosis all-around the defect edges for at least 5-6 cm. The greater omentum is spread in the floor of the wound and fixed to the inner side of the defect. A piece of polypropylene mesh designed according to the size and shape of the defect and sutured to its external edge continuously. Another larger mesh is placed to cover the smaller one and extend over the aponeurosis exceeding the defect edges by at least 5-6 cm and fixed to it.
RESULTS: Six males and five females were included. Mean age was 49.3 year. Mean follow-up period was 17.8 months. Wound infection occurred in 5 patients (45.4%). Mean hospital stay was 18.7 days. No patients developed abdominal compartment syndrome, recurrence or intestinal fistula. No mortality was reported. Two cases developed mild local bulge.
CONCLUSION: This technique provides a simple, safe and effective alternative in the treatment of burst abdomen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen; Burst midline; Closure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194520     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1589-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Biological implants in abdominal wall hernia surgery].

Authors:  Manuel López Cano; Manuel Armengol Carrasco; María Teresa Quiles Pérez; María Antonia Arbós Vía
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.653

2.  Management of laparotomy wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Daniel E Abbott; Gregory A Dumanian; Amy L Halverson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Dynamic parietal closure: initial experience of an original parietal closure procedure for treatment of abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Quentin Qassemyar; François Browet; Micheline Robbe; Pierre Verhaeghe; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06

4.  Repair of large abdominal wall defects by epiploplasty and polypropelene mesh in patients with decompressive laparostomies.

Authors:  Emilio Muñoz Muñoz; Fernando Pardo Aranda; Judith Camps Lasa; Xavier Rodriguez Alsina; Enrique Veloso Veloso
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.653

5.  Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors.

Authors:  T E Pavlidis; I N Galatianos; B T Papaziogas; C N Lazaridis; K S Atmatzidis; J G Makris; T B Papaziogas
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2001-05

6.  Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence.

Authors:  G V Poole
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.

Authors:  H Gislason; A Viste
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-10

8.  Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Magdy A Sorour
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Use of dynamic wound closure system in conjunction with vacuum-assisted closure therapy in delayed closure of open abdomen.

Authors:  A E Salman; F Yetişir; M Aksoy; M Tokaç; M B Yildirim; M Kiliç
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?

Authors:  M van't Riet; P J de Vos van Steenwijk; H J Bonjer; E W Steyerberg; J Jeekel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.