Literature DB >> 3890100

Available rubella serologic tests.

K L Herrmann.   

Abstract

Serologic techniques for the detection of antibodies to rubella virus provide the approach of choice for laboratory diagnosis of acute and congenital rubella infections and for the determination of rubella immunity status. Rubella serodiagnostic tests currently being used in clinical laboratories are described in this review. Advantages, limitations, and relative sensitivities and specificities of these tests are presented. The reactivity and specificity of rubella antibody tests have been shown to vary from laboratory to laboratory and from one manufacturer's kit to another. The need is clearly apparent for a universally accepted reference standard that will allow sensitivities and alternative assays to be compared directly and a meaningful immune cutoff level to be established. Incorporating such standards into the available rubella tests would eliminate much of the diagnostic uncertainty associated with rubella infections during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3890100     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_1.s108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Infect Dis        ISSN: 0162-0886


  9 in total

1.  Increasing rubella seronegativity despite a compulsory school law.

Authors:  T R Schum; D B Nelson; M A Duma; G V Sedmak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  A E Simor; R Chua; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Seroprevalence of rubella among women of childbearing age in Switzerland.

Authors:  J Zufferey; P Jacquier; S Chappuis; O Spinnler; P Hohlfeld; P L Zuber; J Bille
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Detection of rubella virus immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies in whole blood on Whatman paper: comparison with detection in sera.

Authors:  V Punnarugsa; V Mungmee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Prenatal diagnosis and significance of fetal infections.

Authors:  A Ghidini; L Lynch
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

6.  Detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G: comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx).

Authors:  I J Skurrie; J L Head; S M Garland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of novel synthetic peptide-based DETECT-RUBELLA enzyme immunoassays with Enzygnost and IMx for detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G.

Authors:  L Pedneault; M Zrein; L Robillard; F Landry; M Lacroix; J Joncas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Performance of two new enzyme immunoassays for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to rubella.

Authors:  C Granberg; O Meurman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of rubella immune status by three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Authors:  P R Field; D W Ho; A L Cunningham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.