Literature DB >> 3884454

Composition of cellular infiltrates in rejected human corneal allografts.

J S Pepose, M S Nestor, K M Gardner, R Y Foos, T H Pettit.   

Abstract

We utilized the leu series of monoclonal antibodies and an indirect immunoperoxidase technique to quantitate the cellular infiltrates in seven rejected human corneal allografts and compared them to nine identically processed corneas from patients with chronic herpetic stromal keratitis and to three control corneas. The cellular infiltrates in the rejected allografts were of mixed composition, comprised predominantly of leu-1 positive T-lymphocytes and leu-M3 positive macrophages. Both helper and cytotoxic-suppressor T-cells were identified in the stromal lesions. Statistically significant differences were noted in the absolute number of mononuclear cells and macrophages seen infiltrating the rejected corneal allografts compared to the herpetic corneas. We discuss the implications of these findings with regard to possible mechanisms underlying corneal allograft rejection in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3884454     DOI: 10.1007/bf02173536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  Induction of corneal graft rejection by passive cell transfer.

Authors:  A A Khodadoust; A M Silverstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-02

2.  Lymphocyte destruction during corneal homograft reaction. A scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  F M Polack
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-05

3.  Transplantation and rejection of individual cell layers of the cornea.

Authors:  A A Khodadoust; A M Silverstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-04

4.  Separation of functional subsets of human T cells by a monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  E L Reinherz; P C Kung; G Goldstein; S F Schlossman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Cells mediating allograft rejection.

Authors:  B M Hall; S E Dorsch
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 6.  Mechanisms of allograft rejection: the roles of cytotoxic T-cells and delayed-type hypersensitivity.

Authors:  D W Mason; M J Dallman; R P Arthur; P J Morris
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 12.988

7.  The roles of host and donor cells in the rejection of skin allografts by T cell-deprived rats injected with syngeneic T cells.

Authors:  M J Dallman; D W Mason; M Webb
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Heterotopic corneal grafting in mice: a new approach to the study of corneal alloimmunity.

Authors:  J W Streilein; J McCulley; J Y Niederkorn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Human T cell subpopulations defined by a monoclonal antibody. I. A small subset is responsible for proliferation to allogeneic cells or to soluble antigens and for helper activity for B cell differentiation.

Authors:  G Corte; M C Mingari; A Moretta; G Damiani; L Moretta; A Bargellesi
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Histopathological and histochemical alterations in the early stages of corneal graft rejection.

Authors:  F M POLACK
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1962-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  12 in total

1.  Cell subpopulations in failed human corneal grafts.

Authors:  L Kuffová; V Holán; L Lumsden; J V Forrester; M Filipec
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Paradigm shifts in the role of CD4+ T cells in keratoplasty.

Authors:  Khrishen Cunnusamy; Peter W Chen; Jerry Y Niederkorn
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.970

3.  Systemic (serum) soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in corneal transplant recipients.

Authors:  C S Foster; H K Wu; A Merchant
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  D F Larkin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Different Innate Immune Responses in BALB/c and C57BL/6 Strains following Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Tim Bleul; Xinyu Zhuang; Antonia Hildebrand; Clemens Lange; Daniel Böhringer; Günther Schlunck; Thomas Reinhard; Thabo Lapp
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 7.349

6.  Gamma-irradiation reduces the allogenicity of donor corneas.

Authors:  William Stevenson; Sheng-Fu Cheng; Parisa Emami-Naeini; Jing Hua; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Reza Dana; Daniel R Saban
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Functional characterization of chimpanzee cytomegalovirus chemokine, vCXCL-1(CCMV).

Authors:  Mindy Miller-Kittrell; Jiqing Sai; Mark Penfold; Ann Richmond; Tim E Sparer
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  In situ immunohistochemical analysis of cell adhesion molecules on human corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  B J Foets; J J van den Oord; R Volpes; L Missotten
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  CD25+, interleukin-10-producing CD4+ T cells are required for suppressor cell production and immune privilege in the anterior chamber of the eye.

Authors:  Molly E Skelsey; Elizabeth Mayhew; Jerry Y Niederkorn
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Adhesion molecule expression in local-macrophage-depleted rats bearing orthotopic corneal allografts.

Authors:  Tanja P A M Slegers; Gerard van der Veen; L Joep A Hermans; Lidy Broersma; Nico van Rooijen; Hendrika J Völker-Dieben; Gabriel van Rij; Ruth van der Gaag
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.