Literature DB >> 3884190

Balanced reciprocal translocations: risk factors for aneuploid segregant viability.

J R Davis, B B Rogers, R M Hagaman, C A Thies, I C Veomett.   

Abstract

Reciprocal translocations were studied in two groups of balanced carrier couples: 202 had 210 translocation aneuploid between (LB) infants, and 95 couples had repetitive abortions (AB) without liveborn aneuploids. The observed translocation aneuploidies in the LB group were compared to predicted potential aneuploidies in AB by frequency of chromosome involvement, meiotic segregation mode, and mean trisomic, monosomic and combined genomic imbalances. Qualitative and quantitative differences identified genomic regions and chromosomes possibly vital for in utero survivability. LB aneuploidies indicate non-random chromosome involvement, selection of least detrimental segregants and segments, and predominant transmission from maternal balanced carriers (especially in 3:1 tertiary segregation, 93.5%). For an individual with a balanced reciprocal translocation and untested reproductive capability, an approach is given for predicting whether a translocation aneuploid conceptus will be liveborn or aborted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3884190     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1985.tb00179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  7 in total

Review 1.  Are double translocations double trouble?

Authors:  S M Bowser-Riley; M J Griffiths; M R Creasy; P A Farndon; K E Martin; D A Thomson; S A Larkins; R A Johnson; J L Watt
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Cytogenetics of recurrent spontaneous aborters.

Authors:  S P McManus; M A de Arce
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Human reciprocal translocations: is the unbalanced mode at birth predictable?

Authors:  C Cans; O Cohen; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; P Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Logistic regression model to estimate the risk of unbalanced offspring in reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  C Cans; O Cohen; C Lavergne; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; P Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Impact of rearrangements on function and position of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus and on human genetic disorders.

Authors:  M B Qumsiyeh
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  Viability thresholds for partial trisomies and monosomies. A study of 1,159 viable unbalanced reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  O Cohen; C Cans; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; P Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Excess of mental retardation and/or congenital malformation in reciprocal translocations in man.

Authors:  J P Fryns; A Kleczkowska; E Kubień; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.132

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.