Literature DB >> 3882554

Dosage compensation in mammals: why does a gene on the inactive X yield less product than one on the active X?

O J Miller.   

Abstract

An expressed gene on the inactive mammalian X chromosome yields less product than the same gene on the active X. Characteristics of the inactive X which might be responsible for this are late replication, chromatin clumping, and altered patterns of DNA methylation. If an expressed gene on the inactive X is not replicated until late in S, it will be present in two copies for a shorter fraction of the cell cycle than its early replicating homologue and therefore yield less product. Alternatively, transcription may be slowed by a microenvironment of highly condensed chromatin or by an abnormal pattern of methylation of the DNA template. Experiments are proposed by which to test these and related hypotheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3882554     DOI: 10.1007/bf00293275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  51 in total

1.  Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Autonomous gene expression on the human inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  B Kahan; R DeMars
Journal:  Somatic Cell Genet       Date:  1980-05

3.  Replication timing of genes and middle repetitive sequences.

Authors:  M A Goldman; G P Holmquist; M C Gray; L A Caston; A Nag
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  DNA methylation--how important in gene control?

Authors:  A P Bird
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 9-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  In vitro methylation of the hamster adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene inhibits its expression in mouse L cells.

Authors:  R Stein; A Razin; H Cedar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Changes in gene position are accompanied by a change in time of replication.

Authors:  R E Calza; L A Eckhardt; T DelGiudice; C L Schildkraut
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Reactivation of an inactive human X chromosome: evidence for X inactivation by DNA methylation.

Authors:  T Mohandas; R S Sparkes; L J Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Asymmetrical distribution of CpG in an 'average' mammalian gene.

Authors:  M McClelland; R Ivarie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Steroid sulfatase of human leukocytes and epidermis and the diagnosis of recessive X-linked ichthyosis.

Authors:  E H Epstein; M E Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Is DNA methylation responsible for mammalian X chromosome inactivation?

Authors:  D A Miller; E Okamoto; B F Erlanger; O J Miller
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1982
View more
  1 in total

1.  Localization of a gene that escapes inactivation to the X chromosome proximal short arm: implications for X inactivation.

Authors:  C J Brown; H F Willard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.025

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.