Literature DB >> 3875878

Vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment using MR.

M T Modic, D H Feiglin, D W Piraino, F Boumphrey, M A Weinstein, P M Duchesneau, S Rehm.   

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients who were clinically suspected of having vertebral osteomyelitis were prospectively evaluated with magnetic resonance (MR), radiography, and radionuclide studies. These findings were correlated with the final clinical, microbiologic, or histologic diagnoses. Based on the results of these latter studies, 23 patients were believed to have osteomyelitis. MR examinations consisted of at least a sagittal image (TE = 30 msec, TR = 0.5 sec) and an image obtained at TE = 120 msec, TR = 2-3 sec. All patients underwent radiographic and MR examinations, 36 underwent technetium 99m-HDP bone scanning, and 20 patients underwent gallium 67 scanning. Nineteen patients underwent both bone and gallium scanning. The imaging studies were reviewed independently by investigators blinded to the final diagnoses. MR had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 92%, and accuracy of 94%. Combined gallium and bone scan studies (19 cases) had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 94%. Bone scans alone had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 78%, and accuracy of 86%. Plain radiographs had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 57%, and accuracy of 73%. The MR appearance of vertebral osteomyelitis in this study was characteristic, and MR was as accurate and sensitive as radionuclide scanning in the detection of osteomyelitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3875878     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.157.1.3875878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  96 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  C W Heron
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Brodie's abscess presenting in a young soccer player following ankle injury.

Authors:  S P Edmundson; K M Hirpara; R S Ryan; P O'Grady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Primary mediastinal tuberculous abscess: demonstration with MR.

Authors:  R K Gupta; B K Sharma; A Jena; K Pant; R Prakash; B Talukdar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1989

4.  Odontoid osteomyelitis. An unusual presentation of an uncommon disease.

Authors:  J Ruskin; S Shapiro; M McCombs; H Greenberg; E Helmer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

Review 5.  [Postoperative syndrome after spine surgery].

Authors:  F Ahlhelm; W Reith; N Naumann; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; P Papanagiotou; J Kelm; A Nabhan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR imaging after uncomplicated lumbar discography.

Authors:  John A Carrino; Todd C Swathwood; William B Morrison; J Michael Glover
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Osteoid osteoma of the cervical spine. Misleading MR features about a case involving the uncinate process.

Authors:  B Houang; N Grenier; J F Gréselle; J M Vital; C Douws; J Broussin; J M Caillé
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Immunoscintigraphy with antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies for the diagnosis of septic loosening of hip prostheses.

Authors:  A Boubaker; A B Delaloye; C H Blanc; M Dutoit; P F Leyvraz; B Delaloye
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-02

9.  Problems in distinguishing spinal tuberculosis from neoplasia on MRI.

Authors:  R K Gupta; P Agarwal; H Rastogi; S Kumar; R V Phadke; N Krishnani
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections.

Authors:  Filip Gemmel; Paul C Rijk; James M P Collins; Thierry Parlevliet; Katrin D Stumpe; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.