Literature DB >> 17219230

Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR imaging after uncomplicated lumbar discography.

John A Carrino1, Todd C Swathwood, William B Morrison, J Michael Glover.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postdiscography infection is an uncommon complication. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is often the modality of choice for evaluating spinal infection. Discography entails disc access and fluid injection that could alter the baseline MR imaging appearance of the spine and be confounded for infection. Our purpose was to describe the MR imaging findings of the lumbar spine subsequent to uncomplicated discography and to determine if this may mimic infection. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In a prospective cohort study of eight adults (age 22-64 years, mean 45 years) with 22 intradiscal injections, all subjects underwent routine unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging during the 2-3 week interval postdiscography. A subset of four returned for additional MR imaging during the 4-8 week interval postdiscography. MR images were reviewed for intradiscal, endplate, marrow, and epidural findings and then compared with prediscography examinations. Infection was excluded by clinical documentation.
RESULTS: Postdiscography MR imaging showed that almost all levels were similar to baseline prediscography examinations. No levels developed new vertebral marrow edema, fluid-like intradiscal signal, endplate irregularity, or epidural abnormality. Two subjects simulated potential discitis, but these findings were unchanged from prediscography and were related to prior surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Uncomplicated lumbar spine discography does not cause MR imaging changes that simulate discitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219230     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0221-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; C P Parker; S O'Malley; J L Sunner; S W Wiesel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Complications of cervical discography: analysis of 4400 diagnostic disc injections.

Authors:  S M Zeidman; K Thompson; T B Ducker
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Does discography injure normal discs? An analysis of repeat discograms.

Authors:  R G Johnson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Discography causes end plate deflection.

Authors:  M H Heggeness; B J Doherty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal infection: evaluation with MR imaging and intraoperative US.

Authors:  M J Post; R M Quencer; B M Montalvo; B H Katz; F J Eismont; B A Green
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effects on the vertebral end-plate of uncomplicated lumbar discography: an MRI study.

Authors:  A Saifuddin; P Renton; B A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical discography complications and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  P M Connor; B V Darden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Aprill; N Bogduk
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment using MR.

Authors:  M T Modic; D H Feiglin; D W Piraino; F Boumphrey; M A Weinstein; P M Duchesneau; S Rehm
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Postoperative diskitis: distinguishing early MR imaging findings from normal postoperative disk space changes.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; J L Sunner; S W Wiesel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.