Literature DB >> 3873880

Adverse effects of pancuronium during high-dose fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting.

I R Thomson, C L Putnins.   

Abstract

Using a randomized double-blind protocol, the authors prospectively compared three nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with respect to their influence on hemodynamics and on the electrocardiogram. Thirty-three patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with high-dose (100 micrograms/kg) fentanyl anesthesia were studied. Patients received 1.5 X ED95 of either pancuronium (n = 12), metocurine (n = 9), or a metocurine-pancuronium combination (4:1 ratio by weight) (n = 12) for muscle relaxation. Heart rate and rate pressure product (RPP) were significantly higher postinduction in the pancuronium group. Myocardial ischemia, indicated by new ECG ST-segment depression occurred significantly more frequently, and exclusively, in the pancuronium group. The authors' data suggest that since pancuronium is associated with tachycardia and an increased incidence of myocardial ischemia, it is best avoided in patients with severe coronary artery disease undergoing CABG with high-dose fentanyl. Either metocurine or the metocurine-pancuronium combination provides greater hemodynamic stability, without precipitating myocardial ischemia, and can be safely and effectively substituted for pancuronium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3873880     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198506000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  18 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  I R Thomson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Investigation of the cardiac effects of pancuronium, rocuronium, vecuronium, and mivacurium on the isolated rat atrium.

Authors:  Sinan Gursoy; Ihsan Bagcivan; Nedim Durmus; Kenan Kaygusuz; Iclal Ozdemir Kol; Cevdet Duger; Sahin Yildirim; Caner Mimaroglu
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2011-10

3.  Effects of anesthetic induction on myocardial function and metabolism: a comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil.

Authors:  D R Miller; M Wellwood; S J Teasdale; D Laidley; J Ivanov; P Young; M Madonik; P McLaughlin; D A Mickle; R D Weisel
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Comparison of sevoflurane/fentanyl and isoflurane/fentanyl during elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Sevoflurane Venture Group.

Authors:  N R Searle; R J Martineau; P Conzen; A al-Hasani; L Mark; T Ebert; M Muzi; L R Hodgins
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Precipitous bradycardia induced by laryngoscopy in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  W Podolakin; D G Wells
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Anesthesia and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J G Maillé; M Boulanger; I Dyrda; N Trembly
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

7.  Haemodynamic interactions of muscle relaxants and sufentanil in coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  D Côté; R Martin; J P Tétrault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 8.  Adverse effects of nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agents. Incidence, prevention and management.

Authors:  M Abel; W J Book; J B Eisenkraft
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Are "clean" muscle relaxants better?

Authors:  I R Thomson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Perioperative ischaemia in aortic surgery: combined epidural/general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia vs general anaesthesia and i.v. analgesia.

Authors:  R L Garnett; A MacIntyre; P Lindsay; G G Barber; C W Cole; G Hajjar; N V McPhail; T D Ruddy; R Stark; D Boisvert
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.