Literature DB >> 2968185

Effects of anesthetic induction on myocardial function and metabolism: a comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil.

D R Miller1, M Wellwood, S J Teasdale, D Laidley, J Ivanov, P Young, M Madonik, P McLaughlin, D A Mickle, R D Weisel.   

Abstract

Anaesthetic induction may induce myocardial ischaemia. A prospective randomized trial was instituted to compare the effect on ventricular function and myocardial metabolism of induction with fentanyl (FEN) or its analogues sufentanil (SUF) or alfentanil (ALF) in 96 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Haemodynamic, metabolic (coronary sinus oxygen and lactate extraction) and gated ventriculographic measurements were made awake pre-induction (PRE), after induction (IND) and after intubation (INT). Induction was performed with FEN 75 micrograms.kg-1, SUF 15 micrograms.kg-1 or ALF 125 micrograms.kg-1 and metocurine. Fentanyl induction was associated with the greatest stability of mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac performance, and systolic function without associated myocardial lactate production. SUF produced the greatest depression of systolic function (p less than 0.05) but without haemodynamic instability or myocardial lactate production in all but one patient. Induction with ALF produced the greatest reduction in MAP (p less than 0.05) associated with the greatest decrease in diastolic compliance (p less than 0.05) and 50 per cent incidence of myocardial lactate production (p less than 0.05) with no significant change in coronary blood flow or myocardial oxygen consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2968185     DOI: 10.1007/bf03010615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  35 in total

Review 1.  An appreciation of the coronary circulation.

Authors:  D H Sethna; E A Moffitt
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Myocardial metabolism and ventricular function following cold potassium cardioplegia.

Authors:  S E Fremes; R D Weisel; D A Mickle; J Ivanov; M M Madonik; S J Seawright; S Houle; P R McLaughlin; R J Baird
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Anesthetic requirements and cardiovascular effects of fentanyl-oxygen and fentanyl-diazepam-oxygen anesthesia in man.

Authors:  T H Stanley; L R Webster
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A comparison of volume loading and atrial pacing following aortocoronary bypass.

Authors:  R D Weisel; R J Burns; R J Baird; J D Hilton; J Ivanov; D A Mickle; K H Teoh; G T Christakis; P J Evans; H E Scully; B S Goldman; P R McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Effects of preload on the transmural distribution of perfusion and pressure-flow relationships in the canine coronary vascular bed.

Authors:  A K Ellis; F J Klocke
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Analysis of left ventricular function from multiple gated acquisition cardiac blood pool imaging. Comparison to contrast angiography.

Authors:  R D Burow; H W Strauss; R Singleton; M Pond; T Rehn; I K Bailey; L C Griffith; E Nickoloff; B Pitt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil.

Authors:  S Bower; C J Hull
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Hemodynamic changes during fentanyl--oxygen anesthesia for aortocoronary bypass operation.

Authors:  J L Waller; C C Hug; D M Nagle; J M Craver
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Monitoring ventricular function at rest and during exercise with a nonimaging nuclear detector.

Authors:  H N Wagner; P Rigo; R H Baxter; P O Alderson; K H Douglass; D F Housholder
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations.

Authors:  W Grossman; E Braunwald; T Mann; L P McLaurin; L H Green
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of sevoflurane/fentanyl and isoflurane/fentanyl during elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Sevoflurane Venture Group.

Authors:  N R Searle; R J Martineau; P Conzen; A al-Hasani; L Mark; T Ebert; M Muzi; L R Hodgins
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Narcotics and myocardial performance in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  H J Nathan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Alfentanil controls the haemodynamic response during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia.

Authors:  R J Martineau; C P Tousignant; D R Miller; K A Hull
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Cardiovascular response of a continuous variable rate alfentanil infusion for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  D R Miller; R J Martineau; D Ewing; K A Hull; J L Wellington; A G Bouchard
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for opioids in balanced anaesthesia.

Authors:  H J Lemmens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Alfentanil-midazolam anaesthesia has no electrophysiological effects upon the normal conduction system or accessory pathways in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Authors:  M D Sharpe; W B Dobkowski; J M Murkin; G Klein; G Guiraudon; R Yee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Comparison of Two Clinical Protocols for Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) for Breast Surgery Using Propofol Combined With Either Sufentanil or Alfentanil.

Authors:  Oliver C Radke; Darja Sippel; Katja Radke; Reinhard Hilgers; Petra Saur
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-09-03

8.  Is general anesthesia a risk for myocardium? Effect of anesthesia on myocardial function as assessed by cardiac troponin-i in two different groups (isofluran+N2O inhalation and propofol+fentanyl iv anesthesia).

Authors:  Demet Dogan Erol; Ibrahim Ozen
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.