Literature DB >> 3870908

Occult-blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: the risks.

J W Frank1.   

Abstract

The evidence that occult-blood (Hemoccult) screening for colorectal carcinoma is beneficial has been examined in a companion paper. No data have yet been published demonstrating actual reductions in morbidity or mortality among patients undergoing the test. In this paper the risks of occult-blood screening are examined. It is shown that significant harm may result from the test's widespread application, due to the need for extensive endoscopic and radiological investigations in persons with a positive result (the vast majority of whom will subsequently be found not to have cancer). Furthermore, the most favorable benefit-risk ratio in Hemoccult screening (i.e., the highest positive predictive value for cancer) is found among persons over 70 years of age. Yet they are generally the least likely of patients screened to undergo treatment if a cancer is found. It is concluded that the risks of occult-blood screening could outweigh the benefits of any age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3870908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cost-effectiveness of fecal occult blood screening.

Authors:  T G Ganiats; W A Norcross
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-04

3.  Cost effectiveness of HemoQuant versus Hemoccult for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  A M Joseph; T W Crowson; E C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Windeler; J Köbberling
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  When does a man need a check-up?

Authors:  M D Beaulieu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Experiences of patients with false positive results from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  D Mant; R Fitzpatrick; A Hogg; A Fuller; A Farmer; J Verne; J Northover
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Sigmoidoscopy in general practice.

Authors:  S R Glaser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.