Literature DB >> 3867089

An alternative to absorbed dose, quality, and RBE at low exposures.

V P Bond, M N Varma, C A Sondhaus, L E Feinendegen.   

Abstract

The microdosimetric distribution of event sizes, especially for small exposures and high-LET radiation, represents both a fractional involvement of the exposed cell population and variable amounts of energy transferred to the "hit" cells. To determine the fraction of cells that will respond quantally (be transformed) after receiving a hit of a given size, a hit size effectiveness function (HSEF) which appears to have a threshold has been derived from experimental data for pink mutations in Tradescantia. The value of the HSEF at each event size, multiplied by the fractional number of cells hit at that event size, and summed over all event sizes, yields a single value representing the fractional number of quantally responding cells and thus the population impairment for a given exposure. The HSEF can be obtained by unfolding (deconvoluting) several sets of biological and microdosimetric data obtained with radiation of overlapping event size distributions.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3867089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl        ISSN: 0485-8611


  10 in total

Review 1.  Radiation physics.

Authors:  H Blattmann
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-01-15

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  125Iodine decay in DNA: a discussion of its effectiveness for the breaking of DNA strands.

Authors:  G Tisljar-Lentulis; F H Schneeweiss; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Common misinterpretations of the "linear, no-threshold" relationship used in radiation protection.

Authors:  V P Bond; C A Sondhaus
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Radiation risk of tissue late effects, a net consequence of probabilities of various cellular responses.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

7.  A different perception of the linear, nonthreshold hypothesis for low-dose irradiation.

Authors:  V P Bond; V Benary; C A Sondhaus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Werner Hofmann; Wei Bo Li; Werner Friedland; Brian W Miller; Balázs Madas; Manuel Bardiès; Imre Balásházy
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Estimation of relative biological effectiveness for boron neutron capture therapy using the PHITS code coupled with a microdosimetric kinetic model.

Authors:  Hironori Horiguchi; Tatsuhiko Sato; Hiroaki Kumada; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Takeji Sakae
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Microdosimetric Modeling of Biological Effectiveness for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Considering Intra- and Intercellular Heterogeneity in 10B Distribution.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Sato; Shin-Ichiro Masunaga; Hiroaki Kumada; Nobuyuki Hamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.