Literature DB >> 1936050

Radiation risk of tissue late effects, a net consequence of probabilities of various cellular responses.

L E Feinendegen1.   

Abstract

Late effects from the exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation are hardly or not at all observed in man probably due to the low values of risk coefficients that preclude statistical analyses of data from populations that are exposed to doses less than 0.2 Gy. In order to arrive at an assessment of potential risk from radiation exposure in the low dose range, the microdosimetry approach is essential. In the low dose range, ionizing radiation generates particle tracks, mainly electrons, which are distributed rather heterogenously within the exposed tissue. Taking the individual cell as the elemental unit of life, observations and calculations of cellular responses to being hit by energy deposition events from low LET type are analysed. It emerges that besides the probability of a hit cell to sustain a detrimental effect with the consequence of malignant transformation there are probabilities of various adaptive responses that equip the hit cell with a benefit. On the one hand, an improvement of cellular radical detoxification was observed in mouse bone marrow cells; another adaptive response pertaining to improved DNA repair, was reported for human lymphocytes. The improved radical detoxification in mouse bone marrow cells lasts for a period of 5-10 hours and improved DNA repair in human lymphocytes was seen for some 60 hours following acute irradiation. It is speculated that improved radical detoxification and improved DNA repair may reduce the probability of spontaneous carcinogenesis. Thus it is proposed to weigh the probability of detriment for a hit cell within a multicellular system against the probability of benefit through adaptive responses in other hit cells in the same system per radiation exposure. In doing this, the net effect of low doses of low LET radiation in tissue with individual cells being hit by energy deposition events could be zero or even beneficial. Since there was no simple additivity of equal effects from repeated exposures to equal doses and because of the potential effect of adaptive cell responses on the spontaneous evolution of malignancy in tissue, the extrapolation of risk with absorbed dose reaching down to zero, does not appear to be generally valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936050     DOI: 10.1007/bf00956715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  25 in total

Review 1.  1989 Douglas Lea memorial lecture. The cell dose concept; potential application in radiation protection.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Biochemical and cellular mechanisms of low-dose effects.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen; V P Bond; J Booz; H Mühlensiepen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-01

3.  An alternative to absorbed dose, quality, and RBE at low exposures.

Authors:  V P Bond; M N Varma; C A Sondhaus; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

Review 4.  Intranuclear 3H thymidine: dosimetric, radiobiological and radiation protection aspects.

Authors:  V P Bond; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  What is hormesis and why haven't we heard about it before?

Authors:  L A Sagan
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine.

Authors:  G Olivieri; J Bodycote; S Wolff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Rational risk estimation in relation to atomic bomb radiation.

Authors:  S Kondo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Survival, chromosome abnormalities, and recovery in heavy-ion and x-irradiated mammalian cells.

Authors:  L D Skarsgard; B A Kihlman; L Parker; C M Pujara; S Richardson
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1967

9.  Magnetic field affects thymidine kinase in vivo.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen; H Mühlensiepen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1985-06

10.  Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA.

Authors:  S Wolff; V Afzal; J K Wiencke; G Olivieri; A Michaeli
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

2.  Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Yehoshua Socol; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Mohan Doss; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Marek K Janiak; Mark L Miller; Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott; Brant Ulsh; Alexander Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.