Literature DB >> 3858967

Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries.

I Mejàre, H G Gröndahl, K Carlstedt, A C Grever, E Ottosson.   

Abstract

In 63 teenagers the proximal surfaces of premolars to be extracted for orthodontic reasons and the adjacent surfaces of neighboring teeth, 598 surfaces in all, were examined radiographically and by probing. Direct inspection after extraction revealed that 51% of the surfaces had incipient carious lesions and 5% lesions with cavities. Of the surfaces with cavities 82.1% were correctly diagnosed radiographically if any radiolucency, regardless of its extent, was used as a diagnostic criterion. However, this yielded a false positive rate of 19.6%. If only radiolucencies extending at least into the inner third of the enamel were called positive the true positive rate was 36.7% and the associated false positive rate 1.6%. At a 5% cavity frequency the predictive positive values were 17% and 53%, respectively. Probing yielded a true positive rate of about 29% and a false positive rate of 1.1% with a predictive positive value of 50-57%. All radiolucencies extending into the dentin were associated with cavities. When the most liberal radiographic criterion was used 37.5% of all carious lesions, whether associated with a cavity or not, were detected and 3.8% of sound surfaces were falsely called carious. The corresponding predictive positive value at the actual rate of incipient lesions and lesions with cavities was 92.6%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3858967     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1985.tb01328.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Dent Res        ISSN: 0029-845X


  7 in total

1.  Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 2. Prevention of dental caries. The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  D W Lewis; A I Ismail
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Nearinfrared light transillumination for detection of incipient proximal caries in primary molars].

Authors:  Q Zhou; C F Peng; M Qin
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

3.  The ADEPT study: a comparative study of dentists' ability to detect enamel-only proximal caries in bitewing radiographs with and without the use of AssistDent artificial intelligence software.

Authors:  Hugh Devlin; Tomos Williams; Jim Graham; Martin Ashley
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.727

Review 4.  Detection and monitoring of early caries lesions: a review.

Authors:  I A Pretty; K R Ekstrand
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-10-29

5.  Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces.

Authors:  M Bizhang; N Wollenweber; P Singh-Hüsgen; G Danesh; S Zimmer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Detection of proximal caries using quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and laser fluorescence: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hyung-In Yoon; Min-Jeong Yoo; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.

Authors:  R Menem; I Barngkgei; N Beiruti; I Al Haffar; Easter Joury
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.