Literature DB >> 3843677

Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: a pilot study of risk perception.

M G Morgan, P Slovic, I Nair, D Geisler, D MacGregor, B Fischhoff, D Lincoln, K Florig.   

Abstract

The perception of the potential risk arising from human exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields was studied with a quasi-random sample of 116 well-educated, opinion leaders using the risk perception framework previously developed by Slovic, Fischhoff, and Lichtenstein. These individuals rated exposure to fields from transmission lines and electric blankets on a variety of scales that have been found useful in characterizing people's risk attitudes and perceptions. These judgments allowed us to conjecture about the likely desire for regulation of these potential hazards and the likely response to a publicized problem (e.g., an accident or ominous research finding) involving these two sources of exposure. Various forms of detailed information about 50/60 Hz fields were supplied to respondents. The provision of information produced modest, but statistically significant, changes in perceptions in the direction of greater concern about the risks. In response to questions of public policy, participants desired modest regulatory control of field exposure from transmission lines and little or no control of field exposure from appliances like electric blankets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3843677     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  9 in total

Review 1.  Communicating information about the health risks of radioactive waste: a review of obstacles to public understanding.

Authors:  V T Covello
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1989 Apr-May

2.  Health response of two communities to military antennae in Cyprus.

Authors:  A W Preece; A G Georgiou; E J Dunn; S C Farrow
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  A study on the risk perception of light pollution and the process of social amplification of risk in Korea.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Kim; Jae Wook Choi; Eunil Lee; Yong Min Cho; Hyung Rae Ahn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area.

Authors:  Peter M Wiedemann; Holger Schütz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Health responses to a new high-voltage power line route: design of a quasi-experimental prospective field study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jarry T Porsius; Liesbeth Claassen; Tjabe Smid; Fred Woudenberg; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  A Study on the Correlation Between Media Usage Frequency and Audiences' Risk Perception, Emotion and Behavior.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Li; Fangqi Zhong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-20

8.  Communication Mechanisms and Implications of the COVID-19 Risk Event in Chinese Online Communities.

Authors:  Li Pengpeng; Zhong Fangqi; Zhuo Qianru
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19

9.  The Relationship between Risk Perception of Cell Phones and Objective Knowledge of EMF in Korea.

Authors:  Myung-Soon Seo; Jae-Wook Choi; Kyung-Hee Kim; Hyung-Do Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.