Literature DB >> 25649389

A study on the risk perception of light pollution and the process of social amplification of risk in Korea.

Kyung Hee Kim1, Jae Wook Choi, Eunil Lee, Yong Min Cho, Hyung Rae Ahn.   

Abstract

In this study, the risk perception level of each light pollution type was analyzed, and the effects of the variables (e.g., psychometric paradigm factor, trust in the government, etc.) on the process of the increase in the risk perception were analyzed. For the sample population (1096 persons) in Korea, the risk perception levels of each light pollution type and other environmental and health risk factors were compared, and the relative magnitude was examined. In addition, to test which variables affect the group with high-risk perception of each light pollution type, a logistic regression analysis was performed. For the group with highest risk perception of light pollution, the odds ratios (OR) of all psychometric paradigms (excluding controllability) increased compared to those of the group with low-risk perception. Additionally, the level showing the acquisition of information from the media and the recollection level of media criticism on each light pollution type showed a statistically significant increase. Especially, the risk perception of light trespass increased as trust in the government decreased. The significance of this study includes the finding that the public's risk perception of light pollution was significantly affected by the psychometric paradigm factors. Moreover, this study analyzed the differences of the variables that affect the increase in the risk perception of each light pollution type and provided a theoretical framework that can practically reflect the strategy for the risk communication of light pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25649389     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4107-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  21 in total

1.  Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.

Authors:  John T Lang; William K Hallman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Food risk perceptions, gender, and individual differences in avoidance and approach motivation, intuitive and analytic thinking styles, and anxiety.

Authors:  Sointu Leikas; Marjaana Lindeman; Katariina Roininen; Liisa Lähteenmäki
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Light at night co-distributes with incident breast but not lung cancer in the female population of Israel.

Authors:  Itai Kloog; Abraham Haim; Richard G Stevens; Micha Barchana; Boris A Portnov
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Tolerance for environmental health risks: the influence of knowledge, benefits, voluntariness, and environmental attitudes.

Authors:  B N Baird
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Light-at-night-induced circadian disruption, cancer and aging.

Authors:  Vladimir N Anisimov; Irina A Vinogradova; Andrei V Panchenko; Irina G Popovich; Mark A Zabezhinski
Journal:  Curr Aging Sci       Date:  2012-12

6.  Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans.

Authors:  Joshua J Gooley; Kyle Chamberlain; Kurt A Smith; Sat Bir S Khalsa; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Eliza Van Reen; Jamie M Zeitzer; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Circadian rhythms and depression: human psychopathology and animal models.

Authors:  Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Haim Einat
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Night-shift work and risk of colorectal cancer in the nurses' health study.

Authors:  Eva S Schernhammer; Francine Laden; Frank E Speizer; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter; Ichiro Kawachi; Charles S Fuchs; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: a pilot study of risk perception.

Authors:  M G Morgan; P Slovic; I Nair; D Geisler; D MacGregor; B Fischhoff; D Lincoln; K Florig
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Is light-at-night a health risk factor or a health risk predictor?

Authors:  Thomas Kantermann; Till Roenneberg
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.877

View more
  1 in total

1.  Relationship among pollution concerns, attitudes toward social problems, and environmental perceptions in abandoned sites using Bayesian inferential analysis.

Authors:  Eujin Julia Kim; Youngeun Kang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.