Literature DB >> 3835974

Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients.

R A Greenes, C B Begg.   

Abstract

Concern with the efficacy of diagnostic technologies has stimulated numerous studies aimed at quantifying the discriminatory properties of various tests and procedures. These have focused principally on estimations of the result conditional probabilities, given disease status, eg, the sensitivity and specificity or the ROC curve. A source of bias in estimating these probabilities that is often unavoidable is created by the existence of a nonrandom selection mechanism for determining which patients initially tested will receive definitive verification of disease status. Correction for verification bias requires frequency data on the test results and any symptoms or other factors that influence selection for verification, both in the verified sample and in the source sample of patients tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3835974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of a computerized diagnostic decision support system for patients with pneumonia: study design considerations.

Authors:  D Aronsky; K J Chan; P J Haug
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  An Epidemiologic Note on Verification Bias: Implications for Estimation of Rates.

Authors:  Blase Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1999

Review 4.  Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan S Rosman; Mark A Korsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Presentation of the 2008 Morris F. Collen Award to Robert A. Greenes.

Authors:  Lucila Ohno-Machado; Donald Ellison; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?

Authors:  Blase Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-09

9.  Vaginal Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Infection as a Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Tool in a Haitian Population.

Authors:  Joel C Boggan; David K Walmer; Gregory Henderson; Nahida Chakhtoura; Schatzi H McCarthy; Harry J Beauvais; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Quantitating bedside diagnosis: clinical evaluation of ascites.

Authors:  D L Simel; R A Halvorsen; J R Feussner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.