Literature DB >> 3826102

Differences in ambulatory test ordering in England and America. Role of doctors' beliefs and attitudes.

R M Hartley, A M Epstein, C M Harris, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

Forty-five American and English doctors were surveyed to determine whether differences in their beliefs about the incidence and morbidity of complications and the role of testing for patients with chronic hypertension could be contributing to the large cross-national differences previously demonstrated in ambulatory test use for such patients. For each of nine tests, the number the English doctors thought they "should order" was significantly less than that of the American group. English doctors also estimated a lower incidence for each of seven possible complications of hypertension, but there was no difference in perceived morbidity of the complications. Both groups thought results from testing would alter therapy for only a small proportion of patients; however, the English estimate was significantly smaller than the American (16 percent versus 27 percent: p less than 0.05). The reasons given for testing were very similar in the two countries except that American doctors ranked as more important the reason that patients used the quantity of test ordering as an indicator of quality care. These results suggest that differences in ambulatory test use are consistent with physicians' beliefs about the number of tests they should be ordering, disease incidence, the likelihood that testing will affect patient care, and patient expectations. Further study should be directed toward understanding the contributions that differences in physician beliefs about the natural histories of diseases and patient expectations make to variations in test ordering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3826102     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90452-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Use of blood tests in general practice: a collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group.

Authors:  P Leurquin; V Van Casteren; J De Maeseneer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Influence of watchful waiting on satisfaction and anxiety among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints.

Authors:  Marloes A van Bokhoven; Hèlen Koch; Trudy van der Weijden; Richard P T M Grol; Arnold D Kester; Paula E L M Rinkens; Patrick J E Bindels; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  The effect of watchful waiting compared to immediate test ordering instructions on general practitioners' blood test ordering behaviour for patients with unexplained complaints; a randomized clinical trial (ISRCTN55755886).

Authors:  Marloes A van Bokhoven; Hèlen Koch; Trudy van der Weijden; Anuska H M Weekers-Muyres; Patrick J E Bindels; Richard P T M Grol; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice.

Authors:  Marloes A van Bokhoven; Marjolein C H Pleunis-van Empel; Hèlen Koch; Richard P T M Grol; Geert-Jan Dinant; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Does routine repeat testing of critical laboratory values improve their accuracy?

Authors:  Pooya Baradaran Motie; Ali Zare-Mirzaie; Nasrin Shayanfar; Maryam Kadivar
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-02-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.