PURPOSE: We undertook a study to determine whether test-ordering strategy and other consultation-related factors influence satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints. METHODS: A cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted in family medicine practices in the Netherlands. Participants were 498 patients with unexplained complaints seen by 63 primary care physicians. Physicians either immediately ordered a blood test for patients or followed a 4-week watchful waiting approach. Physicians and patients completed questionnaires asking about their characteristics, satisfaction with care, and anxiety, and aspects of the consultation. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction and anxiety. Data were analyzed by multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Patients were generally satisfied with their consultation and had moderately low anxiety afterward (mean scores on 11-point scales, 7.3 and 3.1, respectively), with no difference between the immediate testing and watchful waiting groups (chi(2) = 2.4 and 0.3, respectively). The factors associated with higher odds of satisfaction were mainly related to physician-patient communication: patients' satisfaction with their physician generally, feeling taken seriously, and knowing the seriousness of complaints afterward; physicians' discussing testing and not considering complaints bearable; and older physician age. The same was true for factors associated with higher odds of anxiety: patients expecting testing or referral, patients not knowing the seriousness of their complaints afterward, and physicians not seeing a cause for alarm. CONCLUSIONS: Test-ordering strategy does not influence patients' satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation. Instead, specific aspects of physician-patient communication are important. Apparently, primary care physicians underestimate how much they can contribute to the well-being of their patients by discussing their worries.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We undertook a study to determine whether test-ordering strategy and other consultation-related factors influence satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints. METHODS: A cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted in family medicine practices in the Netherlands. Participants were 498 patients with unexplained complaints seen by 63 primary care physicians. Physicians either immediately ordered a blood test for patients or followed a 4-week watchful waiting approach. Physicians and patients completed questionnaires asking about their characteristics, satisfaction with care, and anxiety, and aspects of the consultation. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction and anxiety. Data were analyzed by multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Patients were generally satisfied with their consultation and had moderately low anxiety afterward (mean scores on 11-point scales, 7.3 and 3.1, respectively), with no difference between the immediate testing and watchful waiting groups (chi(2) = 2.4 and 0.3, respectively). The factors associated with higher odds of satisfaction were mainly related to physician-patient communication: patients' satisfaction with their physician generally, feeling taken seriously, and knowing the seriousness of complaints afterward; physicians' discussing testing and not considering complaints bearable; and older physician age. The same was true for factors associated with higher odds of anxiety: patients expecting testing or referral, patients not knowing the seriousness of their complaints afterward, and physicians not seeing a cause for alarm. CONCLUSIONS: Test-ordering strategy does not influence patients' satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation. Instead, specific aspects of physician-patient communication are important. Apparently, primary care physicians underestimate how much they can contribute to the well-being of their patients by discussing their worries.
Authors: B Mitchell Peck; Peter A Ubel; Debra L Roter; Susan Dorr Goold; David A Asch; Amy S Jeffreys; Steven C Grambow; James A Tulsky Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marloes A van Bokhoven; Marjolein C H Pleunis-van Empel; Hèlen Koch; Richard P T M Grol; Geert-Jan Dinant; Trudy van der Weijden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Marloes A van Bokhoven; Hèlen Koch; Trudy van der Weijden; Richard P T M Grol; Patrick J E Bindels; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2006-03-22 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Debora A Paterniti; Tonya L Fancher; Camille S Cipri; Stefan Timmermans; John Heritage; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-02-22
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz; Daniel J Tancredi; Elizabeth Magnan; Klea D Bertakis; Peter Franks Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Hèlen Koch; Marloes A van Bokhoven; Gerben ter Riet; Jm Tineke van Alphen-Jager; Trudy van der Weijden; Geert-Jan Dinant; Patrick J E Bindels Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Marloes A van Bokhoven; Hèlen Koch; Trudy van der Weijden; Anuska H M Weekers-Muyres; Patrick J E Bindels; Richard P T M Grol; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 7.327