Literature DB >> 3822395

The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer.

R S Brenton, C D Phelps.   

Abstract

To provide a bank of normal perimetric data, we tested the central and peripheral visual fields of 102 novice normal subjects using the Humphrey automated perimeter. All eyes used for visual field testing were first carefully examined to be sure that they were, indeed, normal. We calculated population means and standard deviations of each test location and for each decade for age. Average differential light sensitivity decreased with advancing age: -0.5 dB/decade at fixation, -0.6 dB/decade in the central (30-2) field, and -06. dB/decade in the peripheral (30/60-2) field. However, neither the slope nor the shape of the hill of vision changed with aging. Short-term fluctuation was not constant throughout the visual field, but instead was greater in the periphery than the center.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3822395     DOI: 10.1159/000309679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  17 in total

1.  On weighted visual field indices.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson; P Asman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Characteristics of the normal central visual field measured with resolution perimetry.

Authors:  P House; M Schulzer; S Drance; G Douglas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Pupil size and Perimetry--a pharmacological model using increment and decrement stimuli.

Authors:  David D Martin; Reinhard Vonthein; Helmut Wilhelm; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The driving visual field and a history of motor vehicle collision involvement in older drivers: a population-based examination.

Authors:  Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Joanne Wood; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Portsmouth visual field database: an audit of glaucoma progression.

Authors:  J F Kirwan; A Hustler; H Bobat; L Toms; D P Crabb; A I McNaught
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Perimetric variability: importance of criterion level.

Authors:  L Frisén
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The effect of lens opacity on the resolution visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  P H House; M Schulzer; S M Drance; G R Douglas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations.

Authors:  M Zulauf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of Visual Function in Older Eyes in the Earliest Stages of Age-related Macular Degeneration to Those in Normal Macular Health.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Carrie Huisingh; Mark E Clark; Gregory R Jackson; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.