Literature DB >> 3821487

Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography.

S Bentin, R Frost.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3821487     DOI： 10.3758/bf03197708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN： 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access.

Authors:  K I Forster; E S Bednall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-01

2.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  S Bentin; N Bargai; L Katz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.

Authors:  G B Simpson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.

Authors:  J I Chumbley; D A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11

6.  Sentence context effects on lexically ambiguous words: evidence for a postaccess inhibition process.

Authors:  S Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-11

7.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332
  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.

Authors:  P Tabossi; L Laghi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

2.  Shallow and deep orthographies in Hebrew: the role of vowelization in reading development for unvowelized scripts.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-12

3.  On the process of recognizing inverted words: does it rely only on orientation-invariant cues?

Authors:  David Navon; Ofra Raveh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

4.  Processing unpointed Hebrew: what can we learn from determining the identicalness of monosyllabic and bisyllabic nouns.

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-05

5.  Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs.

Authors:  Paul Miller; Batel Liran-Hazan; Vered Vaknin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Task dependent lexicality effects support interactive models of reading: a meta-analytic neuroimaging review.

Authors:  Chris McNorgan; Sarah Chabal; Daniel O'Young; Sladjana Lukic; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Author’s response: A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: not only possible, but also inevitable.

Authors:  Ram Frost
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Towards a universal model of reading.

Authors:  Ram Frost
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language?

Authors:  Ram Frost; Noam Siegelman; Alona Narkiss; Liron Afek
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22

10.  Simulating Language-specific and Language-general Effects in a Statistical Learning Model of Chinese Reading.

Authors:  Jianfeng Yang; Bruce D McCandliss; Hua Shu; Jason D Zevin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 3.059
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.