| Literature DB >> 3818879 |
K M Stavraky, J E Kincade, M A Stewart, A P Donner.
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that cancer patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer short and long-term survival than cancer patients of higher SES. In this study male and female patients between the ages of 25 and 70, admitted to two Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation Clinics with newly diagnosed cancers of a number of common sites, were interviewed to obtain information on education and occupation, and chronic illnesses other than cancer. Information on stage of disease at diagnosis, exact pathologic diagnosis, date of diagnosis, and treatment before and after admission to the clinic was obtained from clinic charts. Using multiple logistic regression analysis to control for the effect of stage and other variables, there was no convincing evidence that cancer patients of low SES measured by either education or occupation had a less favourable outcome at one year after diagnosis from cancers of all sites combined or lung cancer specifically. The data suggested that any single measure of SES affects males and females differently.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3818879 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90159-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chronic Dis ISSN: 0021-9681