Literature DB >> 3817172

Urinary human chorionic gonadotropin among intrauterine device users: detection with a highly specific and sensitive assay.

A J Wilcox, C R Weinberg, E G Armstrong, R E Canfield.   

Abstract

The mechanism by which the intrauterine device (IUD) prevents clinical pregnancy has not been established. The possibility that the IUD works primarily at the time of implantation or beyond has raised legal and ethical concerns. Numerous studies have measured human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) among IUD users as a way to determine whether implantation routinely occurs in the presence of an IUD. Both positive and negative findings have been reported, reflecting major difficulties in the measurement of hCG at low levels. In this study, we collected daily urine specimens for up to three menstrual cycles from 40 women who used nonmedicated IUDs. We assayed these urines with an immunoradiometric assay that is highly specific for hCG at very low concentrations. This assay allows us to describe patterns of hCG rise and fall that would be undetectable by standard radioimmunoassays. In this study of IUD users, we found only one incident of probable early pregnancy loss among 107 cycles. With the use of an assay sensitive to hCG at levels as low as physiologic background, the possibility of frequent unrecognized implantation among IUD users can be reasonably excluded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Endocrine System; Evaluation; Family Planning; Gonadotropins; Gonadotropins, Chorionic; Hormones; Implantation; Iud; Physiology; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, First Trimester; Preimplantation Phase; Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3817172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis; a disease of reproductive-aged women and the dilemma involving contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Esengül Türkyılmaz; Melahat Yıldırım; Ayşe Filiz Yavuz Avşar
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  How positive is a positive pregnancy test?

Authors:  T Lind; P G Whittaker
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-12

3.  Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update.

Authors:  Daniel Li; Allen J Wilcox; David B Dunson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Tod Aeby
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

5.  Systematic Review of Postfertilization Effects and Potential for Embryo Formation and Loss during the Use of Intrauterine Devices.

Authors:  Cara Buskmiller; Donna Harrison; Lester A Ruppersberger; Patrick P Yeung
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 6.  Development of an assay for a biomarker of pregnancy and early fetal loss.

Authors:  R E Canfield; J F O'Connor; S Birken; A Krichevsky; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The use of biochemical assays in epidemiologic studies of reproduction.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D D Baird; C R Weinberg; E G Armstrong; P I Musey; R E Wehmann; R E Canfield
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Kirsten Black; Pamela Lotke; Kai J Buhling; Nikki B Zite
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.