Daniel Li1, Allen J Wilcox2, David B Dunson3. 1. Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: daniel.li@osumc.edu. 2. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2001, we provided benchmark estimates of probability of pregnancy given a single act of intercourse. Those calculations assumed that intercourse and ovulation are independent. Subsequent research has shown that this assumption is not valid. We provide here an update of previous benchmark estimates. STUDY DESIGN: We reanalyze earlier data from two North Carolina studies that collected daily urine samples and recorded daily intercourse for multiple menstrual cycles. One study comprised 68 sexually active women with either an intrauterine device or tubal ligation. The second was of 221 women who planned to become pregnant and had discontinued use of any birth control at enrollment. Participants had no known fertility problems. New statistical analyses were based on Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian methods. RESULTS: The probability that a single act of intercourse occurs within a woman's fertile window is 25%, compared with 20% in previous calculations. The probability of pregnancy with intercourse on a given menstrual cycle day is correspondingly higher than previously estimated, with the largest increases occurring on menstrual days 12-22. These increases are, however, fairly small (for example, the peak chance of conception on menstrual day 13 increased from 8.6% to 9.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Previous benchmark rates of pregnancy with one act of intercourse were moderately underestimated due to a mistaken assumption about the independence of intercourse and ovulation. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: The chance of pregnancy with a single act of unprotected intercourse is greater than previously estimated. Previous benchmarks may underestimate the efficacy of post-coital contraception. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: In 2001, we provided benchmark estimates of probability of pregnancy given a single act of intercourse. Those calculations assumed that intercourse and ovulation are independent. Subsequent research has shown that this assumption is not valid. We provide here an update of previous benchmark estimates. STUDY DESIGN: We reanalyze earlier data from two North Carolina studies that collected daily urine samples and recorded daily intercourse for multiple menstrual cycles. One study comprised 68 sexually active women with either an intrauterine device or tubal ligation. The second was of 221 women who planned to become pregnant and had discontinued use of any birth control at enrollment. Participants had no known fertility problems. New statistical analyses were based on Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian methods. RESULTS: The probability that a single act of intercourse occurs within a woman's fertile window is 25%, compared with 20% in previous calculations. The probability of pregnancy with intercourse on a given menstrual cycle day is correspondingly higher than previously estimated, with the largest increases occurring on menstrual days 12-22. These increases are, however, fairly small (for example, the peak chance of conception on menstrual day 13 increased from 8.6% to 9.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Previous benchmark rates of pregnancy with one act of intercourse were moderately underestimated due to a mistaken assumption about the independence of intercourse and ovulation. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: The chance of pregnancy with a single act of unprotected intercourse is greater than previously estimated. Previous benchmarks may underestimate the efficacy of post-coital contraception. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: A J Wilcox; Donna Day Baird; David B Dunson; D Robert McConnaughey; James S Kesner; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2004-06-09 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Susan B Bullivant; Sarah A Sellergren; Kathleen Stern; Natasha A Spencer; Suma Jacob; Julie A Mennella; Martha K McClintock Journal: J Sex Res Date: 2004-02
Authors: A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg; J F O'Connor; D D Baird; J P Schlatterer; R E Canfield; E G Armstrong; B C Nisula Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-07-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bhawana Shrestha; Alison Schaefer; Elizabeth C Chavez; Alexander J Kopp; Timothy M Jacobs; Thomas R Moench; Samuel K Lai Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2020-09-13 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Bhawana Shrestha; Alison Schaefer; Yong Zhu; Jamal Saada; Timothy M Jacobs; Elizabeth C Chavez; Stuart S Olmsted; Carlos A Cruz-Teran; Gabriela Baldeon Vaca; Kathleen Vincent; Thomas R Moench; Samuel K Lai Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Bhawana Shrestha; Kathleen Vincent; Alison Schaefer; Yong Zhu; Gracie Vargas; Massoud Motamedi; Kelsi Swope; Josh Morton; Carrie Simpson; Henry Pham; Miles B Brennan; Michael H Pauly; Larry Zeitlin; Barry Bratcher; Kevin J Whaley; Thomas R Moench; Samuel K Lai Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kathryn E Fay; Amelia C Clement; Alexandra Gero; Jennifer E Kaiser; Jessica N Sanders; Abena A BakenRa; David K Turok Journal: Contraception Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 3.051