Literature DB >> 3816314

Evaluation of inhalation aids of metered dose inhalers in asthmatic children.

H Lee, H E Evans.   

Abstract

Many patients have incorrect aerosol inhalation technique with metered dose inhalers (MDI). Several inhalation aids have been developed and marketed for these patients. Even those who have correct inhalation technique may benefit from these devices. We compared bronchodilator efficacy of two puffs of albuterol aerosol administered either directly from a MDI mouthpiece, or from an inhalation aid (InspirEase, Aerochamber, Aerosol Bag) in 20 children who had previously demonstrated proper inhalation technique. The children received two puffs of aerosol from a MDI in each of two modalities tested each day on four different days (double blind). One modality contained albuterol aerosol and the other placebo. Pulmonary function was tested before and at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after treatment. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased similarly after all four modes of administration. Six patients who had incorrect inhalation technique benefited from the three inhalation aids. The aerosol bag and InspirEase produced slightly greater bronchodilator response than the Aerochamber. The inhalation aids are useful devices for those who have incorrect inhalation technique, but those who have correct technique do not derive any benefit from these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3816314     DOI: 10.1378/chest.91.3.366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

1.  Randomised controlled study of clinical efficacy of spacer therapy in asthma with regard to electrostatic charge.

Authors:  E Dompeling; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H M Janssens; W Hop; J G Brinkman; R N Sukhai; J C de Jongste
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Tailored education may reduce health literacy disparities in asthma self-management.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Kristin A Riekert; Andrew Bilderback; Arjun Chanmugam; Peter Hill; Cynthia S Rand; Fred L Brancati; Jerry A Krishnan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Classification and treatment of pneumonia.

Authors:  R Bahl; N Bhandari; M K Bhan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Influence of spacer device on drug delivery to young children with asthma.

Authors:  L Agertoft; S Pedersen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Controller Inhalers: Overview of Devices, Instructions for Use, Errors, and Interventions to Improve Technique.

Authors:  Patrick K Gleeson; Scott Feldman; Andrea J Apter
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-03-12

8.  Inhalational drug delivery from seven different spacer devices.

Authors:  P W Barry; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  A Rationale for Going Back to the Future: Use of Disposable Spacers for Pressurised Metered Dose Inhalers.

Authors:  Mark Sanders; Ronald Bruin
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2015-09-27

Review 10.  A review of the in vitro and in vivo valved holding chamber (VHC) literature with a focus on the AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu Anti-static VHC.

Authors:  Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Jason Suggett
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.