Literature DB >> 3816232

Severe pain at interval IUD insertion: a case-control analysis of patient risk factors.

I C Chi, L F Galich, P F Tauber, L R Wilkens, C S Waszak, A J Siemens, J Lippes.   

Abstract

This investigation, using a case-control analysis approach on an IUD data set from a less-developed country center, delineated four risk factors in patient characteristics that are associated with severe pain at interval IUD insertion. They are: higher education (greater than or equal to seven years), low-parity (1-2 live births), longer open interval (greater than or equal to 13 months) between the end of the last pregnancy and insertion, and non-breastfeeding at the time of insertion. Adjusted relative risks estimated by odds ratios are 2.1, 2.7, 2.7 and 5.0, respectively. For women with a combination of the above risk factors, they have a further increased (additive in nature) risk of suffering severe insertion pain. Similar analysis was also performed on a developed country center data set for which only the effect of education and parity could be studied; an odds ratio of 5.0 for nulliparity was obtained. The plausibility of these findings as well as their clinical and programmatic implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Americas; Breast Feeding; Central America; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Diseases; Economic Factors; Educational Status; Europe; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Germany, Federal Republic Of; Guatemala; Health; Infant Nutrition; Insertion; Iud; Latin America; North America; Northern America; Nutrition; Pain; Parity; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Signs And Symptoms; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Treatment; United States; Western Europe

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3816232     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90057-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Cervical lidocaine for IUD insertional pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Colleen P McNicholas; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Diana Mansour; Christian Fiala; Andrew M Kaunitz; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-09-27

Review 3.  Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Jeffrey T Jensen; Ilza Monteiro; Tina Peers; Maria Rodriguez; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elaine Cristina Fontes de Oliveira; Thaís Baêta; Ana Paula Caldeira Brant; Agnaldo Silva-Filho; Ana Luiza Lunardi Rocha
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 5.  Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  K Gemzell-Danielsson; D Mansour; C Fiala; A M Kaunitz; L Bahamondes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.