Literature DB >> 3815340

Carcinogenicity of mutagens: predictive capability of the Salmonella mutagenesis assay for rodent carcinogenicity.

E Zeiger.   

Abstract

A total of 224 chemicals that have been tested in long-term studies for carcinogenicity in rats and mice by the National Cancer Institute and the National Toxicology Program were tested for mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium. Correlations between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity were examined. The influences of chemical structure, rodent species and organ responses, and bacterial strain responses on the carcinogenesis/mutagenesis correlations were also examined. Not all carcinogens induced tumors in both rats and mice. A clear mutagenic or equivocal mutagenic response in Salmonella was predictive for 77% of the carcinogens or equivocal carcinogens, although only 54% of the 149 carcinogens or equivocal carcinogens were mutagens, and 58% of the nonmutagens were carcinogens or equivocal carcinogens. The proportion of mutagens and equivocal mutagens that were not carcinogenic or equivocal was 23%. There was no apparent way to distinguish the mutagenic carcinogens from the mutagenic noncarcinogens by the responses of the specific Salmonella strains. The proportions of different chemical classes in the data base strongly affected the correlations; 40% of the chlorinated carcinogens were mutagens, whereas 75% of the amines and 100% of the nitro-containing carcinogens were mutagens. Because 29% of the chemicals (30% of the carcinogens) were chlorinated, the poor correlation of this class was reflected in the overall correlation. It is concluded that the use of the Salmonella mutagenicity assay is warranted for the identification of carcinogens, but not for noncarcinogens. The proportion of carcinogens detected as mutagens is dependent on the specific classes of chemicals tested and on the rodent species used to define the carcinogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3815340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

Review 1.  Dietary carcinogens, environmental pollution, and cancer: some misconceptions.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1990

Review 2.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. I. Methods of testing exposure.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

3.  Bioassay-directed chemical characterization of genotoxic agents in the dissolved and particulate water phases of the Besos and Llobregat Rivers (Barcelona, Spain).

Authors:  M Grifoll; A M Solanas; J M Bayona
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  In vitro erythropoiesis from bone marrow-derived progenitors provides a physiological assay for toxic and mutagenic compounds.

Authors:  J Shuga; J Zhang; L D Samson; H F Lodish; L G Griffith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Critical review of styrene genotoxicity focused on the mutagenicity/clastogenicity literature and using current organization of economic cooperation and development guidance.

Authors:  Martha M Moore; Lynn H Pottenger; Tamara House-Knight
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Comparison of in vitro test systems using bacterial and mammalian cells for genotoxicity assessment within the "health-related indication value (HRIV) concept.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Prantl; Meike Kramer; Carsten K Schmidt; Martina Knauer; Stefan Gartiser; Aliaksandra Shuliakevich; Julia Milas; Hansruedi Glatt; Walter Meinl; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  The genetic toxicity of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro-2-methylpropane, and 1,2,3-tribromo-2-methylpropane.

Authors:  R H McKee; R D Phillips; K A Traul
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 9.  Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; J Lewtas; H E Brockman
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.691

10.  Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.