Literature DB >> 3813372

Subglottic stenosis: retrospective analysis and proposal for standard reporting system.

K M Grundfast, M S Morris, C Bernsley.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis was undertaken reviewing management of 67 patients treated for subglottic stenosis (SGS) at the Children's Hospital National Medical Center (CHNMC) between 1980 and 1985. Forty-seven (90%) of the patients were followed for at least 18 months from the time diagnosis was made. Twenty-three (66%) of the patients followed for at least 18 months were successfully decannulated or had an adequate airway without tracheotomy. To compare efficacy of management of SGS at the CHNMC with management outcomes previously reported, a review of medical literature was undertaken and data from the most significant reports on management of SGS were collated and tabulated. Since analysis of published reports did not yield a consensus regarding optimal methods for management, and statistics in many published reports were absent or unclear, authors of the previously published reports were contacted personally by means of a letter and survey questionnaire. Results of the survey show that many authors have not performed a statistical review of their case data to determine relative efficacy of different surgical procedures. Thus, retrospective review of cases managed at the CHNMC as well as information obtained from leading experts in management of SGS indicate that there is no single optimal procedure or technique for management of all cases of SGS. Further, the way in which surgical procedures for management of SGS are being reported makes difficult the process of meaningfully comparing results reported by different surgeons. A reporting system is proposed that uses specific terms and objective parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3813372     DOI: 10.1177/000348948709600123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  7 in total

1.  [Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implant in adults].

Authors:  F Holinski; F Elhajzein; G Scholz; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Two-stage repair of extensive subglottic tracheal stenosis.

Authors:  T Somers; J Marquet; E Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Relationship between degree of obstruction and airflow limitation in subglottic stenosis.

Authors:  Emily L Lin; Jonathan M Bock; Carlton J Zdanski; Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Causes and consequences of adult laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander Gelbard; David O Francis; Vlad C Sandulache; John C Simmons; Donald T Donovan; Julina Ongkasuwan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Anaesthesia for tracheal resection and anastomosis.

Authors:  Ashwin Marwaha; Akhil Kumar; Shikha Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  Central airway obstruction: is it time to move forward?

Authors:  Fernando Guedes; Mariana V Branquinho; Ana C Sousa; Rui D Alvites; António Bugalho; Ana Colette Maurício
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  A proposed grading system for post-intubation tracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Ali Ghorbani; Azizollah Abbasi Dezfouli; Mohammad Behgam Shadmehr; Saviz Pejhan; Seyed Reza Saghebi; Aba-Saad Ghare-Daghi; Roya Farzanegan; Nahid Jahanshahi
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2012
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.