Literature DB >> 29171660

Relationship between degree of obstruction and airflow limitation in subglottic stenosis.

Emily L Lin1,2, Jonathan M Bock2, Carlton J Zdanski3, Julia S Kimbell3, Guilherme J M Garcia1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is one of the most common airway disorders in pediatric patients. Currently, treatment decisions rely primarily on the Cotton-Myer scale, which classifies SGS severity based on percentage reduction in airspace cross-sectional area (CSA). However, the precise relationship between upper airway resistance and subglottic CSA is unknown. We hypothesize that airway resistance can be described by the Bernoulli Obstruction Theory, which predicts that airway resistance is inversely proportional to airspace CSA ( R∝A-1) in cases of severe constriction.
METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of six healthy subjects and five SGS patients were used to create three-dimensional models of the respiratory tract from nostrils to carina. Cylindrical segments of varying lengths and varying diameters were digitally inserted in the subglottis of the healthy subjects to create simulated SGS models. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were run, and airway resistance was computed in the simulated SGS models and actual SGS models.
RESULTS: Constriction diameter had a greater impact in airway resistance than constriction length. In agreement with the Bernoulli Obstruction Theory, airway resistance in the simulated SGS models was well represented by the power law R=aAb, where a is a constant and the exponent b ranged from -0.85 to -1.07. The percentage reduction in airflow (QOBSTRUCTIONQHEALTHY) at a constant pressure drop was found to be directly proportional to the percentage reduction in CSA (AOBSTRUCTIONAHEALTHY) in the limit of severe constrictions, namely QOBSTRUCTIONQHEALTHY=kAOBSTRUCTIONAHEALTHY, where k=2.25 ± 0.15. Airway resistances in the simulated SGS models were similar to resistances in models based on CT scans of actual SGS patients, suggesting that our simulated SGS models were representative of airway resistance in actual SGS patients.
CONCLUSION: Our computer simulations suggest that the degree of airflow limitation in SGS patients may be estimated based on anatomic measurements alone. Future studies are recommended to test these predictions in larger cohorts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1551-1557, 2018.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bernoulli Obstruction Theory; Subglottic stenosis; airflow limitation; airway resistance; computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations; pediatric airway

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29171660      PMCID: PMC5967982          DOI: 10.1002/lary.27006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  23 in total

1.  Measuring in situ central airway resistance in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  K Wassermann; A Koch; A Warschkow; F Mathen; J Müller-Ehmsen; H E Eckel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Classification of laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  T V McCaffrey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Mechanics of airflow in the human nasal airways.

Authors:  D J Doorly; D J Taylor; R C Schroter
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.931

4.  Acquired total (grade 4) subglottic stenosis in children.

Authors:  L M Gustafson; B E Hartley; R T Cotton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  The relationship between nasal resistance to airflow and the airspace minimal cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Benjamin M Hariri; Ruchin G Patel; John S Rhee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Neonatal subglottic stenosis--incidence and trends.

Authors:  D L Walner; M S Loewen; R E Kimura
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Subglottic stenosis: retrospective analysis and proposal for standard reporting system.

Authors:  K M Grundfast; M S Morris; C Bernsley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Use of pressure-volume loops for physiological assessment of adult laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  S Mahmoud Nouraei; Anil Patel; Jag S Virk; Colin R Butler; Guri S Sandhu; S A Reza Nouraei
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Management of laryngotracheal stenosis in infants and children: the role of re-do surgery in cases of severe subglottic stenosis.

Authors:  Kosaku Maeda; Shigeru Ono; Katsuhisa Baba
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Diagnosis of laryngotracheal stenosis from routine pulmonary physiology using the expiratory disproportion index.

Authors:  S A Reza Nouraei; S Mahmoud Nouraei; Anil Patel; Kevin Murphy; Dino A Giussani; Elias F Koury; James M Brown; P Jeremy George; Andrew C Cummins; Guri S Sandhu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  6 in total

1.  Central airway issues in bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Erik B Hysinger
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2021-04-24

2.  Subglottic Stenosis Position Affects Work of Breathing.

Authors:  Max M Yang; Nara S Higano; Chamindu C Gunatilaka; Erik B Hysinger; Raouf S Amin; Jason C Woods; Alister J Bates
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia from chest radiographs to magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: adding value.

Authors:  Nara S Higano; Alister J Bates; Chamindu C Gunatilaka; Erik B Hysinger; Paul J Critser; Russel Hirsch; Jason C Woods; Robert J Fleck
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms and Physiological Changes behind Benign Tracheal and Subglottic Stenosis in Adults.

Authors:  Alessandro Marchioni; Roberto Tonelli; Alessandro Andreani; Gaia Francesca Cappiello; Matteo Fermi; Fabiana Trentacosti; Ivana Castaniere; Riccardo Fantini; Luca Tabbì; Dario Andrisani; Filippo Gozzi; Giulia Bruzzi; Linda Manicardi; Antonio Moretti; Serena Baroncini; Anna Valeria Samarelli; Massimo Pinelli; Giorgio De Santis; Alessandro Stefani; Daniele Marchioni; Francesco Mattioli; Enrico Clini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Monitoring Adult Subglottic Stenosis With Spirometry and Dyspnea Index: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Eleftherios Ntouniadakis; Josefin Sundh; Mathias von Beckerath
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.591

6.  Orally Inhaled Drug Particle Transport in Computerized Models of Laryngotracheal Stenosis.

Authors:  Dennis Onyeka Frank-Ito; Seth Morris Cohen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.