Literature DB >> 3811347

Clinical information systems--a review.

B I Blum.   

Abstract

TWO HYPOTHESES ARE OFFERED IN THIS REVIEW OF CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS: that the technology is mature, and that benefits to patient care can be shown. More than ten years of operational experience exist with each general class of clinical information systems, and these systems favorably affect staff, reduce errors, improve accessibility to medical information and provide alerts and reminders. To reinforce the maturity hypothesis, most cited studies are also a decade old. Clinically oriented systems are practical and can improve the health care process-a key goal in this era of prepaid or prospective payment for services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3811347      PMCID: PMC1307152     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  15 in total

1.  Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system.

Authors:  G O Barnett; R Winickoff; J L Dorsey; M M Morgan; R S Lurie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior.

Authors:  C J Mc Donald
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Ward information-management system--an evaluation.

Authors:  D W Simborg; L K Macdonald; J S Liebman; P Musco
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1972-10

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence and medical informatics.

Authors:  B I Blum
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1986 Jan-Mar

5.  Data base management, feedback control, and the Regenstrief Medical Record.

Authors:  C McDonald; L Blevins; T Glazener; J Haas; L Lemmon; J Meeks-Johnson
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  The Johns Hopkins Oncology Clinical Information System.

Authors:  R E Lenhard; B I Blum; J M Sunderland; H G Braine; R Saral
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Do information systems improve the quality of clinical research? Results of a randomized trial in a cooperative multi-institutional cancer group.

Authors:  D D Wirtschafter; M Scalise; C Henke; R A Gams
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1981-02

8.  Computerized medication monitoring system.

Authors:  R K Hulse; S J Clark; J C Jackson; H R Warner; R M Gardner
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1976-10

9.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A controlled experiment to evaluate the use of a time-oriented summary medical record.

Authors:  Q E Whiting-O'Keefe; D W Simborg; W V Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computerisation and decision making in neonatal intensive care: a cognitive engineering investigation.

Authors:  E Alberdi; K Gilhooly; J Hunter; R Logie; A Lyon; N McIntosh; J Reiss
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  A Systematic Investigation on Barriers and Critical Success Factors for Clinical Information Systems in Integrated Care Settings.

Authors:  A Hoerbst; M Schweitzer
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

Review 3.  Evolving principles of office quality assurance.

Authors:  L A Norman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-08

4.  Computer based information systems in primary health care--why?

Authors:  K Moidu; O Wigertz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  The physician as a locus of authority, responsibility, and operational control of medical systems.

Authors:  B A Friedman; J B Martin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.