Literature DB >> 3808071

Chunking by a pigeon in a serial learning task.

H S Terrace.   

Abstract

A basic principle of human memory is that lists that can be organized into memorable 'chunks' are easier to remember. Memory span is limited to a roughly constant number of chunks and is to a large extent independent of the amount of informaton contained in each chunk. Depending on the ingenuity of the code used to integrate discrete items into chunks, one can substantially increase the number of items that can be recalled correctly. Newly developed paradigms for studying memory in non-verbal organisms allow comparison of the abilities of human and non-human subjects to memorize lists. Here I present two types of evidence that pigeons 'chunk' 5-element lists whose components (colours and achromatic geometric forms) are clustered into distinct groups. Those lists were learned twice as rapidly as a homogeneous list of colours or heterogeneous lists in which the elements are not clustered. The pigeons were also tested for knowledge of the order of two elements drawn from the 5-element lists. They responded in the correct order only to those subsets that contained a chunk boundary. Thus chunking can be studied profitably in animal subjects; the cognitive processes that allow an organism to form chunks do no presuppose linguistic competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3808071     DOI: 10.1038/325149a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  12 in total

1.  The development of functional response units: the role of demarcating stimuli.

Authors:  A K Reid; C Z Chadwick; M Dunham; A Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakai; Katsuya Kitaguchi; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Pigeons rank-order responses to temporally sequential stimuli.

Authors:  Neil McMillan; William A Roberts
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Processing of hierarchic stimulus structures has advantages in humans and animals.

Authors:  M Siemann; J D Delius
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Working memory for patterned sequences of auditory objects in a songbird.

Authors:  Jordan A Comins; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-07-16

7.  Seven-month-old infants chunk items in memory.

Authors:  Mariko Moher; Arin S Tuerk; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-05-09

8.  Pauses enhance chunk recognition in song element strings by zebra finches.

Authors:  Michelle Spierings; Anouk de Weger; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Developmental Abilities to Form Chunks in Immediate Memory and Its Non-Relationship to Span Development.

Authors:  Fabien Mathy; Michael Fartoukh; Nicolas Gauvrit; Alessandro Guida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-23

10.  Tracking Plasticity: Effects of Long-Term Rehearsal in Expert Dancers Encoding Music to Movement.

Authors:  Rachel J Bar; Joseph F X DeSouza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.