Literature DB >> 3806262

Visual display units and pregnancy: evidence from the Montreal survey.

A D McDonald, N M Cherry, C Delorme, J C McDonald.   

Abstract

Data on 56,012 current and 48,608 previous pregnancies were obtained by interview in 11 Montreal hospitals, 1982 to 1984, after delivery or spontaneous abortion. In 17,632 pregnancies in occupations with substantial use of visual display units (VDUs), users and nonusers had similar rates of congenital defects in both current and previous pregnancies and of abortions in previous pregnancies. In current pregnancies there was an excess of abortions in users which could have been due to biased recall. In a further analysis of all 42 occupational groups ranked according to percentage use of VDUs, the risk of spontaneous abortion in both current and previous pregnancies was the same irrespective of the amount of VDU use. Thus, the study does not support the suggestion that work with a VDU in pregnancy increases the risk of congenital defect or spontaneous abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3806262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  7 in total

1.  Cardiovascular malformations and maternal exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen; K Kurppa; K Rantala
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Fetal death and work in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N M Cherry; R Côté; J Lavoie; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-03

3.  Advice on Pre-natal Work and Employment.

Authors:  H E Bryant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Work with visual display units in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N Cherry; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-08

Review 5.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 7.  Human adverse reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic field exposures: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  G M Shaw; L A Croen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.