Literature DB >> 3665701

The differential effect of optic nerve disease on pattern and focal electroretinograms.

F A Billson.   

Abstract

We studied nine cases of retrobulbar neuritis with confirmed multiple sclerosis and six cases of optic atrophy from other causes. Pattern and focal electroretinograms (macular ERGs) were recorded with high (400 cd/m2) and low (40 cd/m2) intensity stimuli. Contrast sensitivity was also measured with a simple printed test. Luminance was not markedly important. High spatial frequency contrast sensitivity was significantly correlated with pattern ERG amplitude. Pattern and focal ERG amplitude ratio was usually reduced, but the effect was not correlated with contrast sensitivity or large enough to be useful clinically. In optic atrophy the pattern ERG (PERG) was clearly more severely reduced than the focal ERG (FERG). In retrobulbar neuritis both ERGs were equally and more severely reduced even though the visual losses were less. In unilateral cases the PERG increased then decreased after the initial attack, as previously described (Arden et al., 1982). The results suggest that retinal layers beyond the ganglion cells may be affected in retrobulbar neuritis, but proximally generated, pattern-specific ERG components are selectively lost in optic atrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3665701     DOI: 10.1007/bf00162719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  21 in total

1.  The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  G S Brindley; G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Recording the contralateral PERG: effect of different electrodes.

Authors:  N S Peachey; S Sokol; A Moskowitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Pigeon pattern electroretinogram: a response unaffected by chronic section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  P Bagnoli; V Porciatti; W Francesconi; R Barsellotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Recording the pattern electroretinogram: a cautionary note.

Authors:  W H Seiple; I M Siegel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Human pattern-evoked retinal responses are altered by optic atrophy.

Authors:  W W Dawson; T M Maida; M L Rubin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in diseases of the macula and optic nerve.

Authors:  J Sherman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  G B Arden; J J Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing.

Authors:  B L Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  1 in total

1.  Macular electroretinograms and contrast sensitivity as sensitive detectors of early maculopathy.

Authors:  F A Billson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.