Literature DB >> 3799666

Opportunities for improving the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment.

W B Stason.   

Abstract

Hypertension is an extremely important public health problem, both medically and economically. The cost burden of treatment may significantly compromise care for the individual patient, while in aggregate the direct costs of antihypertensive treatment in the United States approach $8 billion a year. Improved insurance coverage and efforts to control the costs of antihypertensive treatment are needed. Efforts to reduce the costs of care, with minimal or no reduction in its quality, should focus on the following: limiting treatment to patients with sustained diastolic hypertension; improving the efficiency of the delivery process; and emphasizing "low-cost prescribing strategies." The uncertainty that remains over the risk-benefit ratio of pharmacologic treatment for patients with very mild hypertension (90 to 94 mm Hg diastolic) raises additional questions. Even if treatment of mild hypertension is effective, it is without doubt less cost-effective than treatment of moderate and severe hypertension. Is this cost worthwhile? Such trade-offs of cost and benefits will increasingly have to be confronted in the face of limited health care resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3799666     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90528-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reserpine: a relic from the past or a neglected drug of the present for achieving cost containment in treating hypertension?

Authors:  G J Magarian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  What do you do when the blood pressure is up? An approach to the known hypertensive who has an elevated blood pressure.

Authors:  R L Schiff; M H Cohen; A Balson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in organ or bone marrow transplant recipients with systemic mycoses.

Authors:  U Persson; G R Tennvall; S Andersson; G Tyden; B Wettermark
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The costs of treating hypertension.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  On the costs of treating mild hypertension.

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Mild hypertension and public policy: a perspective.

Authors:  P D Levinson; R A Carleton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  H Pardell; R Tresserras; P Armario; R Hernández del Rey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?

Authors:  T H Payne; J D Goodson; M M Morgan; G O Barnett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.