Literature DB >> 1744760

Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?

T H Payne1, J D Goodson, M M Morgan, G O Barnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the types and costs of drugs prescribed by resident and staff physicians treating patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, using a computer-based medical record database.
SETTING: Primary care internal medicine clinic in a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Hypertensive patients seen by ten postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) and PGY-2 primary care internal medicine residents and four staff physicians practicing in the same clinic.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The types and costs of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for the patients treated by resident and staff physicians were compared. A larger proportion of patients of resident physicians than of staff physicians were treated with calcium channel blockers [19(15%) vs. 40(4%), p less than 0.001]; residents prescribed thiazide diuretics less frequently and beta-blockers more frequently than did staff physicians, although these differences were not significant. The estimated average wholesale price of antihypertensive drugs for patients cared for by residents was 35% higher than that for patients cared for by staff physicians ($0.73 vs. $0.54, p = 0.048). This difference was not fully explained by differences in practice composition.
CONCLUSIONS: Resident physicians in this study selected more expensive medications to treat hypertension than did their faculty preceptors, even when differences in practice composition were considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744760     DOI: 10.1007/bf02598167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  11 in total

1.  Microx.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Lett Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Influence of simple computerized feedback on prescription charges in an ambulatory clinic. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C O Hershey; D K Porter; D Breslau; D I Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  "Cost containment" in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  In defense of traditional antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  M Moser
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  In defense of alternative antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  R M Zusman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice.

Authors:  G O Barnett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Opportunities for improving the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  W B Stason
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-12-31       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Financial cost as an obstacle to hypertension therapy.

Authors:  N B Shulman; B Martinez; D Brogan; A A Carr; C G Miles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimizing healthcare research data warehouse design through past COSTAR query analysis.

Authors:  S N Murphy; M M Morgan; G O Barnett; H C Chueh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.