Literature DB >> 3796684

Accurate prediction of the outcome of pediatric intensive care. A new quantitative method.

M M Pollack, U E Ruttimann, P R Getson.   

Abstract

We surveyed nine pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) to compare patient populations and to test prospectively the hypothesis that differences in mortality rates were due to differences in severity of illness. Age, clinical service, the reason for admission (emergency or scheduled), and the seriousness of the underlying chronic disease were recorded on admission. The severity of illness was assessed on the day of admission with a physiology-based measure, the Physiologic Stability Index. The resulting score was used to group patients according to mortality risk. The observed numbers of ICU survivors and nonsurvivors in each mortality-risk group from eight of the pediatric ICUs were compared with the predicted numbers of survivors and nonsurviors calculated from a mathematical function (logistic model) derived earlier from data on 822 patients at one of the institutions. Patient populations in the ICUs differed significantly with respect to age (range of medians, 15 to 36 months; P less than 0.0001), medical admissions (range, 39 to 81 percent; P less than 0.0001), emergency admissions (range, 53 to 91 percent; P less than 0.0001), and the percentage of patients with serious underlying chronic disease (range, 18 to 48 percent; P less than 0.0001). Mortality rates also differed significantly (range, 3.0 to 17.6 percent; P less than 0.0001), as did the Physiologic Stability Index scores (P less than 0.0001). The mathematical function based on the Physiologic Stability Index score and on age reliably predicted the outcomes in all ICUs. We conclude that differences in mortality rates among pediatric ICUs can be explained by differences in the severity of illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3796684     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198701153160304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  32 in total

1.  The clinical risk index of babies (CRIB) score in India.

Authors:  Rajesh Khanna; Vikas Taneja; Saroj K Singh; Nirmal Kumar; V Sreenivas; Jacob M Puliyel
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Quantitative quality assurance in a community hospital pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  B S Frank; M M Pollack
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-08

Review 3.  Audit--where do we go from here?

Authors:  R I Russell; P J Helms
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  An objective method to evaluate rationing of pediatric intensive care beds.

Authors:  J J Stambouly; M M Pollack; U E Ruttimann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Outcome of oncology patients in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Y Sivan; P H Schwartz; T Schonfeld; I J Cohen; C J Newth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Predicting death from initial disease severity in very low birthweight infants: a method for comparing the performance of neonatal units.

Authors:  W Tarnow-Mordi; S Ogston; A R Wilkinson; E Reid; J Gregory; M Saeed; R Wilkie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-23

7.  The importance of technology for achieving superior outcomes from intensive care. Brazil APACHE III Study Group.

Authors:  P G Bastos; W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; A Magalhães; X Sun; D P Wagner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Evaluation of pediatric intensive care scoring systems.

Authors:  H L Price; D J Matthew
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Computer-assisted assessment of patient care in the hospital.

Authors:  E R Gabrieli
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 10.  Morbidity: Changing the Outcome Paradigm for Pediatric Critical Care.

Authors:  Julia A Heneghan; Murray M Pollack
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.278

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.