Literature DB >> 3794064

Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners.

S A Gelfand, N Piper, S Silman.   

Abstract

Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise was investigated as a function of age for essentially normal hearing listeners 21-68 years old, using the nonsense syllable test (NST) [Resnick et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 58, S114 (1975)]. The subjects audited the materials in quiet and at S/N ratios of +10 and +5 dB at their most comfortable listening levels (MCLs). The MCLs approximated conversational speech levels and were not significantly different between the age groups. The effects of age group, S/N condition (quiet, S/N +10, S/N +5) and NST subsets, and the S/N condition X subset interaction were all significant. Interactions involving the age factor were nonsignificant. Confusion matrices were similar across age groups, including the directions of errors between the most frequently confused phonemes. Also, the older subjects experienced performance decrements on the same features that were least accurately recognized by the younger subjects. The findings suggest that essentially normal older persons listening in quiet and in noise experience decreased consonant recognition ability, but that the nature of their phoneme confusions is similar to that of younger individuals. Even though the older subjects met the same selection criteria as did younger ones, there was an expected shift upward in auditory thresholds with age within these limits. Sensitivity at 8000 Hz was correlated with NST scores in noise when controlling for age, but the correlation between performance in noise and age was nonsignificant when controlling for the 8000-Hz threshold. These associations seem to implicate the phenomena underlying the increased 8000-Hz thresholds in the speech recognition problems of the elderly, and appear to support the concept of peripheral auditory deterioration with aging even among those with essentially normal hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3794064     DOI: 10.1121/1.394323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.

Authors:  Pierre L Divenyi; Philip B Stark; Kara M Haupt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English.

Authors:  Junfeng Li; Lin Yang; Jianping Zhang; Yonghong Yan; Yi Hu; Masato Akagi; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Emily M Ellis; Lucas S Baltzell; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  A latent consolidation phase in auditory identification learning: time in the awake state is sufficient.

Authors:  Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Minka Hildesheimer; Avi Karni
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  The role of the arcuate and middle longitudinal fasciculi in speech perception in noise in adulthood.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Maxime Perron; Isabelle Deschamps; Dan Kennedy-Higgins; Jean-Christophe Houde; Anthony Steven Dick; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Voiced initial consonant perception deficits in older listeners with hearing loss and good and poor word recognition.

Authors:  Susan L Phillips; Scott J Richter; David McPherson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Megan Vargo
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.