Literature DB >> 3789015

Couple agreement before and after genetic counseling.

J R Sorenson, D C Wertz.   

Abstract

Before receiving genetic counseling, 699 couples completed questionnaires that were identical for both spouses. Of 385 couples where both spouses indicated a major reason for seeking counseling, 45% identified the same major reason while 55% identified different reasons. In 74% of 542 fertile couples, both spouses had identical short-term reproductive plans: 60% desired the same ideal number of children; and 44% perceived the same level of risk of having an affected child. Agreement on the seriousness of eleven potential problems occasioned by an affected child ranged from 55% to 67%. Couples were asked to return questionnaires within 7 to 10 days after counseling. At this time 76% of spouses agreed about short-term reproductive plans; 66% agreed about longer-term reproductive plans; and 60% agreed about ideal number of children. There were statistically significant increases in agreement about risk interpretation and about six of eleven potential problems in raising an affected child. The data suggest that a substantial number of couples come to genetic counseling with varying concerns and reproductive plans. There is, in general, as much disagreement on these issues between spouses after as before counseling. Implications for counseling are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3789015     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  8 in total

1.  Male partners' role in Latinas' amniocentesis decisions.

Authors:  Carole H Browner; H Mabel Preloran
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Provider gender and moral reasoning: the politics of an "ethics of care.

Authors:  Dorothy C Wertz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews.

Authors:  B M Burke; A Kolker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  To Use or Not to Use: Male Partners' Perspectives on Decision Making About Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  R Kenen; A C Smith; C Watkins; C Zuber-Pittore
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Analysis of problems in making the reproductive decision after genetic counselling.

Authors:  P G Frets; H J Duivenvoorden; F Verhage; B M Peters-Romeyn; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Genetic Counselors' Experiences with Paternal Involvement in Prenatal Genetic Counseling Sessions: An Exploratory Investigation.

Authors:  Richard S Lafans; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Managing Couple Conflict During Prenatal Counseling Sessions: An Investigation of Genetic Counselor Experiences and Perceptions.

Authors:  Kara Schoeffel; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Karol Rubin; Bonnie LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Decision-making about reproductive choices among individuals at-risk for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Deborah Thorne; Jennifer Williamson; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.