Literature DB >> 2051456

Analysis of problems in making the reproductive decision after genetic counselling.

P G Frets1, H J Duivenvoorden, F Verhage, B M Peters-Romeyn, M F Niermeijer.   

Abstract

A follow up study of 164 couples to evaluate reproductive decision making two to three years after genetic counselling showed that 43% had problems making the reproductive decision. These couples (1) had experienced difficulty in the decision making process, (2) had doubts about the decision they had made, or (3) had been unable to make a decision. Using logistic regression analysis we identified the following factors as independently and significantly associated with problems in the decision making process: (1) no postcounselling relief, (2) anticipation of a high risk level, (3) relatives' disapproval of decision, (4) a decision against having children, and (5) the presence of an affected child. Interestingly, of the couples that decided to have children, 45% of those who were eligible for prenatal diagnosis experienced the decision making process as difficult compared with 23% of those for whom prenatal diagnosis was not available (p less than 0.05). Problems in the decision making process may become apparent after genetic counselling rather than in the course of it. We suggest a structured follow up three to six months after genetic counselling to identify couples that would benefit from additional supportive counselling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2051456      PMCID: PMC1016805          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.28.3.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  18 in total

1.  On estimating the relation between blood group and disease.

Authors:  B WOOLF
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1955-06       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  The psychological sequelae of abortion performed for a genetic indication.

Authors:  B D Blumberg; M S Golbus; K H Hanson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Model identifying the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.

Authors:  P G Frets; H J Duivenvoorden; F Verhage; E Ketzer; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-04

4.  Family planning decisions after the birth of a cystic fibrosis child. The impact of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; J J Cassiman; H van den Berghe
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1988

5.  Patients' subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling.

Authors:  J H Pearn
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Couple agreement before and after genetic counseling.

Authors:  J R Sorenson; D C Wertz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986-11

7.  Genetic counseling -- the postcounseling period: II. Making reproductive choices.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1979

8.  Genetic counseling and reproductive uncertainty.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J R Sorenson; T C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-05

9.  Attitudes of patients after "genetic" termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  P Donnai; N Charles; R Harris
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21

10.  Sequelae and support after termination of pregnancy for fetal malformation.

Authors:  J Lloyd; K M Laurence
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-23
View more
  6 in total

1.  Male partners' role in Latinas' amniocentesis decisions.

Authors:  Carole H Browner; H Mabel Preloran
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "Respect for autonomy" in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  "Suddenly Having two Positive People who are Carriers is a Whole New Thing" - Experiences of Couples Both Identified as Carriers of Cystic Fibrosis Through a Population-Based Carrier Screening Program in Australia.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; Martin B Delatycki; John Massie; Jan Hodgson; Sharon Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Shock, adjust, decide: reproductive decision making in cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier couples--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jessica Myring; William Beckett; Rupinder Jassi; Theresa Roberts; Richard Sayers; Diana Scotcher; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Reproductive decision making: interviews with mothers of children with undiagnosed developmental delay.

Authors:  Emily Pond; Rebecca Dimond
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 6.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.