Literature DB >> 3778881

Compact units in proteins.

M H Zehfus, G D Rose.   

Abstract

An explicit measure of geometric compactness called the coefficient of compactness is introduced. This single value figure of merit identifies those continuous segments of the polypeptide chain having the smallest solvent-accessible surface area for their volume. These segments are the most compact units of the protein, and the larger ones correspond to conventional protein domains. To demonstrate the plausibility of this approach as a method of identifying protein domains, the measure is applied to lysozyme and ribonuclease to discover their constituent compact units. These units are then compared with domains, subdomains, and modules found by other methods. To show the sensitivity of the method, the measure is used to successfully differentiate between native and deliberately misfolded proteins [Novotný, J., Bruccoleri, R., & Karplus, M. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 177, 787-818]. Methods that utilize only backbone atoms to define domains cannot distinguish between authentic and misfolded molecules because their backbone conformations are virtually superimposable. Compact units identified by this method exhibit a hierarchic organization. Such an organization suggests possible folding pathways that can be tested experimentally.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3778881     DOI: 10.1021/bi00367a062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  20 in total

1.  A physical basis for protein secondary structure.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; G D Rose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

Authors:  C J Tsai; J V Maizel; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Comparison of protein fragments identified by limited proteolysis and by computational cutting of proteins.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Tsai; Patrizia Polverino de Laureto; Angelo Fontana; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Reducing the computational complexity of protein folding via fragment folding and assembly.

Authors:  Nurit Haspel; Chung-Jung Tsai; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Comparison of the structural basis for thermal stability between archaeal and bacterial proteins.

Authors:  Yanrui Ding; Yujie Cai; Yonggang Han; Bingqiang Zhao
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Stability of protein pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  M C Manning; K Patel; R T Borchardt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Automatic recognition of hydrophobic clusters and their correlation with protein folding units.

Authors:  M H Zehfus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Domain assignment for protein structures using a consensus approach: characterization and analysis.

Authors:  S Jones; M Stewart; A Michie; M B Swindells; C Orengo; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Hydrophobic folding units at protein-protein interfaces: implications to protein folding and to protein-protein association.

Authors:  C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Identification of compact, hydrophobically stabilized domains and modules containing multiple peptide chains.

Authors:  M H Zehfus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.