Literature DB >> 3777115

Binocular vs. monocular task performance.

J E Sheedy, I L Bailey, M Buri, E Bass.   

Abstract

Functional advantages of binocularity were investigated by having 13 subjects perform a group of occupational-type tasks under monocular and binocular conditions. Significant binocular advantages ranging from 29.5% (pointers in straws) to 3.7% (reading speed) were measured. Tasks with many disparity cues showed the greatest binocular advantage. This shows that patients with normal binocular vision use binocular cues, most likely stereopsis, to enhance performance. In a second experiment, three subjects with normal binocular vision underwent monocular occlusion for 5 days to investigate whether monocular skills improved to compensate for the loss of binocular vision. During that period binocular performance was consistently better than monocular performance, and both monocular and binocular performance improved, even though the subjects were only gaining monocular experience. Although the 5 day occlusion period does not simulate the long-term denial of normal binocularity that strabismics or monocular patients experience, it shows that binocular superiority remains after short-term loss of binocularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3777115     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198610000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  19 in total

1.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jie Xi; Wu-Li Jia; Li-Xia Feng; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Evaluation of visual evoked potential binocular summation after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Rasoul Amini Vishteh; Ali Mirzajani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Abolghasem Taghieh
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Adriana Ferreira; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Association between reading speed, cycloplegic refractive error, and oculomotor function in reading disabled children versus controls.

Authors:  Patrick Quaid; Trefford Simpson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model.

Authors:  L Frisén; B Lindblom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.

Authors:  Irina Sverdlichenko; Mark S Mandelcorn; Galia Issashar Leibovitzh; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Samuel N Markowitz; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.992

9.  Perceptual Visual Distortions in Adult Amblyopia and Their Relationship to Clinical Features.

Authors:  Marianne E F Piano; Peter J Bex; Anita J Simmers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The role of binocular disparity in rapid scene and pattern recognition.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.