Literature DB >> 3775373

Distribution of airborne radon-222 concentrations in U.S. homes.

A V Nero, M B Schwehr, W W Nazaroff, K L Revzan.   

Abstract

Apparently large exposures of the general public to the radioactive decay products of radon-222 present in indoor air have led to systematical appraisal of monitoring data from U.S. single-family homes; several ways of aggregating data were used that take into account differences in sample selection and season of measurements. The resulting distribution of annual-average radon-222 concentrations can be characterized by an arithmetic mean of 1.5 picocurie per liter (55 becquerels per cubic meter) and a long tail with 1 to 3% of homes exceeding 8 picocuries per liter, or by a geometric mean of 0.9 picocurie per liter and a geometric standard deviation of about 2.8. The standard deviation in the means is 15%, estimated from the number and variability of the available data sets, but the total uncertainty is larger because these data may not be representative. Available dose-response data suggest that an average of 1.5 picocuries per liter contributes about 0.3% lifetime risk of lung cancer and that, in the million homes with the highest concentrations, where annual exposures approximate or exceed those received by underground uranium miners, long-term occupants suffer an added lifetime risk of at least 2%, reaching extraordinary values at the highest concentrations observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3775373     DOI: 10.1126/science.3775373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  22 in total

1.  Indoor radon--what is to be done?

Authors:  M Roach; K A Weaver
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-01

2.  Radon risk assessment: The effect of voluntary sampling distributions and bias.

Authors:  K O Levy; M J Small
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Comparative survey of outdoor, residential and workplace radon concentrations.

Authors:  Nirmalla Barros; Dan W Field; Daniel J Steck; R William Field
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Radon-222 concentration in groundwater and cancer mortality in North Carolina.

Authors:  G W Collman; D P Loomis; D P Sandler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Toward a more realistic appraisal of the lung cancer risk from radon: the effects of residential mobility.

Authors:  K E Warner; D Mendez; P N Courant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Radon as a risk factor for extra-pulmonary tumours.

Authors:  O Axelson; F Forastiere
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1993

7.  Radon exposure in residences and lung cancer among women: combined analysis of three studies.

Authors:  J H Lubin; Z Liang; Z Hrubec; G Pershagen; J B Schoenberg; W J Blot; J B Klotz; Z Y Xu; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  In defense of body CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Luís Guimarães; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Bevacizumab: the evidence for its clinical potential in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sonya Haslam; Paul Chrisp
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2007-03-31

10.  A geostatistical approach to assess the spatial association between indoor radon concentration, geological features and building characteristics: the case of Lombardy, Northern Italy.

Authors:  Riccardo Borgoni; Valeria Tritto; Carlo Bigliotto; Daniela de Bartolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.