Literature DB >> 3772598

The admission urinalysis: impact on patient care.

K Kroenke, J F Hanley, J B Copley, J I Matthews, C E Davis, C J Foulks, J L Carpenter.   

Abstract

Although urinalysis is one of the most frequently ordered tests in primary care, its usefulness in screening has not been demonstrated. A retrospective review of 1,607 admission urinalyses for inpatients in a referral/community hospital identified 861 as clinically indicated and 746 as routine. Routine urinalyses were abnormal less frequently than clinically indicated urinalyses (18.1% vs 39.6%) and when abnormal, were responded to less often (33.3% vs 75.4%). Forty-five (6.0%) of the routine urinalyses yielded an abnormality that led to diagnostic action. Of these, 18 were normal on repeat testing and 17 were considered unlikely to represent significant disease. Therefore, only ten (1.3%) of the routine urinalyses affected patient therapy. In eight of these cases, the abnormality was pyuria, of which six proved to be asymptomatic bacteriuria. The admission urinalysis as a routine test had little impact on patient care in the authors' institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772598     DOI: 10.1007/bf02596190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  The periodic health examination: evaluation of routine tests and procedures.

Authors:  T W CLARK; S S SCHOR; K O ELSOM; J P HUBBARD; K A ELSOM
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A controlled trial of multiphasic screening.

Authors:  D M Olsen; R L Kane; P H Proctor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The "abnormal" screening laboratory results. Its effect on physician and patient.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; L DeSalvo; S Baylor; P L Wolf
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1972-01

4.  Follow-up of 164 patients with bacteriuria of pregnancy.

Authors:  B Haswell; M E Sidaway; H E de Wardener
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1968-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Judgment based on 95 per cent confidence limits: a statistical dilemma involving multitest screening and proficiency testing of multiple specimens.

Authors:  I Schoen; S H Brooks
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Preoperative evaluation of the healthy patient.

Authors:  J A Robbins; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Periodic health examination: a guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymptomatic patients. Medical Practice Committee, American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Microscopy of urine--now you see it, now you don't!

Authors:  A Z Györy; A M Kesson; J M Talbot
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Controlled trial of therapy in covert bacteriuria of childhood.

Authors:  D C Savage; G Howie; K Adler; M I Wilson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The use of the differential leukocyte count for inpatient casefinding.

Authors:  D P Connelly; M P McClain; T W Crowson; E S Benson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J A Heine; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The questionable value of routine admission urinalyses.

Authors:  F A Hubbell; B V Akin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-09

3.  Usefulness of routine admission complete blood cell counts on a general medical service.

Authors:  E B Frye; F A Hubbell; B V Akin; L Rucker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Using clinical data to predict abnormal serum electrolytes and blood cell profiles.

Authors:  W M Tierney; D K Martin; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Screening with urinary dipsticks for reducing morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-28

6.  Urinanalysis (UA): a neglected but easy and inexpensive diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Sándor Györik; Peter Jandus; Claudio Marone
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2009-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.