Literature DB >> 3770325

Human auditory steady state responses: effects of intensity and frequency.

R Rodriguez, T Picton, D Linden, G Hamel, G Laframboise.   

Abstract

Human auditory steady state responses were recorded in 41 normal subjects and 22 patients with hearing loss. The effect of intensity on the responses at different tonal frequencies was assessed using the sweep technique. The amplitude of the responses increases and the phase delay decreases with increasing intensity. Both the amplitude and the phase delay are smaller for high frequency tone bursts. Notched noise decreases the amplitude of the response by a factor of two but does not affect the phase of the responses. Thresholds were estimated in waking subjects using two techniques: intensity sweeps analyzed by linear regressions, and fixed intensities analyzed by Hotelling's T2 test. Frequency-specific thresholds obtained with notched noise were less variable and more accurate with the fixed intensity technique. In patients with sensorineural hearing loss the amplitude increased more with increasing intensity above threshold than in patients with conductive hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3770325     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198610000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Jamal Alsamri; M Sasha John; David Purcell; Sahara George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Jeremy W Murphy; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Identifying congenital hearing impairment: preliminary results from a comparative study using objective and subjective audiometric protocols.

Authors:  A Ciorba; S Hatzopoulos; J Petruccelli; M Mazzoli; A Pastore; K Kochanek; P Skarzynski; A Wlodarczyk; H Skarzynski
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Auditory steady-state responses in school-aged children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luciana Macedo de Resende; Sirley Alves da Silva Carvalho; Thamara Suzi Dos Santos; Filipe Ibraim Abdo; Matheus Romão; Marcela Cristina Ferreira; Carlos Julio Tierra-Criollo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Responses With Conventional Audiometry in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hadeel Y Tarawneh; Hamid R Sohrabi; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Ralph N Martins; Dona M P Jayakody
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Neural Representation of Interaural Time Differences in Humans-an Objective Measure that Matches Behavioural Performance.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Nick R Haywood; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.