Literature DB >> 3769169

Systemic vascular resistance: an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload.

R M Lang, K M Borow, A Neumann, D Janzen.   

Abstract

Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) is a frequently used clinical index of left ventricular afterload. However, SVR may not adequately assess left ventricular afterload (i.e., ventricular internal fiber load during systole) since it reflects only peripheral vasomotor tone. In contrast, left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (sigma es) reflects the combined effects of peripheral loading conditions and left ventricular chamber pressure, dimension, and wall thickness. To determine the relationship between SVR and sigma es, left ventricular afterload and contractility were pharmacologically altered in eight dogs instrumented with central aortic microtip and Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheters. Left ventricular wall thicknesses and dimensions were measured from two-dimensionally targeted M mode echocardiograms. Aortic, right atrial, and left ventricular end-systolic pressures as well as cardiac output were recorded. SVR and sigma es were determined under control conditions as well as during infusions of nitroprusside, methoxamine, dobutamine, and norepinephrine. Control data acquired before each drug infusion were similar. When compared with baseline values, SVR underestimated the magnitude of change in left ventricular sigma es by 22% when afterload alone was decreased (nitroprusside), 54% when afterload alone was increased (methoxamine), and 50% when afterload was decreased and contractility was augmented (dobutamine). Most importantly, when afterload was minimally decreased in association with augmented contractility (norepinephrine), SVR increased by 21% while sigma es fell by 9%. Thus, discordant changes in left ventricular afterload (i.e., sigma es) and SVR can occur during pharmacologic interventions. SVR is an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload, reflecting only peripheral arteriolar tone rather than left ventricular systolic wall force. This emphasizes the fact that a true measure of left ventricular afterload must consider the interaction of factors internal and external to the myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769169     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Sergio Mondillo; Marco Solari; Francesca Maria Righini; Valentina Andrei; Carla Contaldi; Eugenia De Marco; Michele Di Mauro; Roberta Esposito; Sabina Gallina; Roberta Montisci; Andrea Rossi; Maurizio Galderisi; Stefano Nistri; Eustachio Agricola; Donato Mele
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Practical points in the application of oxygen transport principles.

Authors:  P Nightingale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Long term doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in childhood: non-invasive evaluation of the contractile state and diastolic filling.

Authors:  G Hausdorf; G Morf; G Beron; R Erttmann; K Winkler; G Landbeck; E W Keck
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-10

4.  The use of levodopa, an oral dopamine precursor, in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  G Broderick; S I Rajfer
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.165

5.  Regional myocardial function abnormalities are associated with macro- and microcirculation dysfunction in the metabolic syndrome: the RESOLVE study.

Authors:  Philippe Obert; Guillaume Walther; Frédéric Dutheil; Bruno Lesourd; Robert Chapier; Daniel Courteix; Agnes Vinet
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Impact of acute moderate elevation in left ventricular afterload on diastolic transmitral flow efficiency: analysis by vortex formation time.

Authors:  Panupong Jiamsripong; Anna M Calleja; Mohsen S Alharthi; Mate Dzsinich; Eileen M McMahon; Jeffrey J Heys; Michele Milano; Partho P Sengupta; Bijoy K Khandheria; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Hemodynamic monitoring in childhood.

Authors:  H Stopfkuchen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Effects of increasing afterload on early diastolic dysfunction in hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  G Hausdorf; V Siglow; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-09

Review 9.  Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care.

Authors:  S M Tibby; I A Murdoch
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Comparison of cardiac output measured with echocardiographic volumes and aortic Doppler methods during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  O Axler; B Megarbane; C Lentschener; H Fernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.