Literature DB >> 3769134

Response of experimental animals to human carcinogens: an analysis based upon the IARC Monographs programme.

J Wilbourn, L Haroun, E Heseltine, J Kaldor, C Partensky, H Vainio.   

Abstract

Only the results of epidemiological studies can be used to establish a causal relationship between an exposure to an agent and human cancer; however, such studies often cannot be carried out due to limitations of population or latent period or to the presence of mixed exposures. It is essential, therefore, that the validity be established of extrapolating to humans the results obtained from long-term carcinogenicity tests in animals. The responses of experimental animals to known and suspected human carcinogens, as evaluated in the IARC Monographs series, were analysed as an indication of the sensitivity of animal tests for predicting human carcinogens. Although the response was high - 84% - it would have been even higher had all the compounds been adequately tested experimentally. An additional finding was that for many exposures causally related to human cancer, there is a target organ in common between humans and at least one animal species, despite many inherent physiological differences. These findings show clearly the importance of experimental carcinogenicity studies in the primary prevention of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769134     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/7.11.1853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  18 in total

Review 1.  Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; J Lewtas; H E Brockman
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.691

2.  Human carcinogenesis by arsenic.

Authors:  M J Mass
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  The nature and significance of public exposure to arsenic: a review of its relevance to South West England.

Authors:  P Mitchell; D Barre
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Arsenite cocarcinogenesis: an animal model derived from genetic toxicology studies.

Authors:  Toby G Rossman; Ahmed N Uddin; Fredric J Burns; Maarten C Bosland
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Sawmill chemicals and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Are animal models predictive for humans?

Authors:  Niall Shanks; Ray Greek; Jean Greek
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.464

7.  Ranking the potential carcinogenic hazards to workers from exposures to chemicals that are tumorigenic in rodents.

Authors:  L S Gold; G M Backman; N K Hooper; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Multifactor potency scheme for comparing the carcinogenic activity of chemicals.

Authors:  S Nesnow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Chemicals and cancer in humans: first evidence in experimental animals.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.

Authors:  V A Fung; J C Barrett; J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.